The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bsegall@google.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com,
	hdanton@sina.com, chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org,
	frederic@kernel.org, arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com,
	christian.loehle@arm.com, tj@kernel.org,
	tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/20] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:29:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajNKE1P9JGxDh0CD@yury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617174139.155540-5-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:11:23PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> This patch does
> - Declare and Define cpu_preferred_mask.
> - Get/Set helpers for it.
> 
> Values are set/clear by the scheduler by detecting the steal time values.
> 
> A CPU is set to preferred when it becomes active. Later it may be
> marked as non-preferred depending on steal time values with
> steal monitor being enabled.
> 
> Always maintain design construct of preferred is subset of active.
> i.e. preferred ⊆ active ⊆ online ⊆ present ⊆ possible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v3->v4:
> - Make preferred subser of active instead of online.

s/subser/subset

> 
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/cpu.c            | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/core.c     |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 80211900f373..30ea64cc1656 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -120,12 +120,20 @@ extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask;
>  extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask;
>  extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
>  extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
> +extern struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask;
> +#else
> +#define __cpu_preferred_mask __cpu_active_mask
> +#endif
> +
>  #define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)
>  #define cpu_online_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask)
>  #define cpu_enabled_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask)
>  #define cpu_present_mask  ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
>  #define cpu_active_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
>  #define cpu_dying_mask    ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
> +#define cpu_preferred_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_preferred_mask)
>  
>  extern atomic_t __num_online_cpus;
>  extern unsigned int __num_possible_cpus;
> @@ -1164,6 +1172,7 @@ void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpumask *src);
>  
>  void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
>  void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible);
> +void set_cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu, bool preferred);
>  
>  /**
>   * to_cpumask - convert a NR_CPUS bitmap to a struct cpumask *
> @@ -1256,7 +1265,12 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>  	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_dying_mask);
>  }
>  
> -#else
> +static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_preferred_mask);
> +}
> +
> +#else	/* NR_CPUS <= 1 */
>  
>  #define num_online_cpus()	1U
>  #define num_possible_cpus()	1U
> @@ -1294,6 +1308,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return cpu == 0;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* NR_CPUS > 1 */
>  
>  #define cpu_is_offline(cpu)	unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index bc4f7a9ba64e..c196ba5d8b2a 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -3107,6 +3107,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_dying_mask);
>  atomic_t __num_online_cpus __read_mostly;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_online_cpus);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
> +struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask __read_mostly;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_preferred_mask);
> +#endif
> +
>  void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
>  {
>  	cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
> @@ -3154,6 +3159,14 @@ void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +void set_cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu, bool preferred)
> +{
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU))
> +		return;
> +
> +	assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_preferred_mask, (preferred));
> +}

set_cpu_xxx() is a macro on purpose - it improves code generation
quite a lot. See 5c563ee90a22d. Can you keep set_cpu_preferred aligned
with the other set_cpu(), i.e. make it a macro?

> +
>  /*
>   * Activate the first processor.
>   */
> @@ -3164,6 +3177,7 @@ void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
>  	/* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */
>  	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>  	set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
> +	set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>  	set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>  	set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 2f4530eb543f..9e16946c9d62 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8685,6 +8685,9 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
>  	 */
>  	sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
>  
> +	/* preferred is subset of active and follows its state */
> +	set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);

Did you put it at the end of the function on purpose? If yes, please
add a comment. If no, I'd prefer to have it immediately after
set_cpu_active().

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -8698,6 +8701,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	set_cpu_preferred(cpu, false);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
>  	 * load balancing when not active
> -- 
> 2.47.3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-17 17:41 [PATCH v4 00/20] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  0:51   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  3:44     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  1:29   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2026-06-18  3:53     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  8:27       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  3:32   ` Yury Norov
     [not found]     ` <c4546759-b316-47e7-aa97-408e20d0f6ed@linux.ibm.com>
2026-06-18  4:49       ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  5:14         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  3:49   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  4:22     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] sched/fair: Select preferred CPU at wakeup when possible Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] sched/fair: load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  3:03   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  3:54     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:09   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  6:05     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] sched/debug: Create debugfs folder steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] sched/debug: Provide debugfs to enable/disable " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] sched/core: Introduce a simple " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:30   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  4:44     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  5:32       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-18  6:01         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  6:39           ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  6:45             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  7:16               ` Yury Norov
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] sched/core: Compute steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:04   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  5:39     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] sched/core: Introduce default arch handling code for inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
     [not found]   ` <ajNwy25WYg45AQJX@yury>
2026-06-18  4:42     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] sched/core: Handle steal values and mark CPUs as preferred Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] sched/core: Mark the direction of steal values to avoid oscillations Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] sched/debug: Add debug knobs for steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-17 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] sched/core: Add a few check for valid CPU in inc/dec of preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-18  4:21   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  4:40     ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajNKE1P9JGxDh0CD@yury \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox