The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@readmodwrite.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
	 sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: sched_ext/lavd hard lockup in old call_rcu_tasks_generic needadjust path
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 07:56:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajOWZ3JvlmihMNAH@matt-Precision-5490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35337ded-add4-4689-8f61-73f583a69b36@paulmck-laptop>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 08:24:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 11:56:19AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > 
> > What about something like this?
> 
> Not bad, actually.
> 
> But we are going to have to similarly bypass call_rcu_tasks_generic()
> soon enough, though only when interrupts are disabled at the time
> of the call.  One complication is that it would need to interact
> with rcu_barrier_tasks_generic(), which would need to remove any
> pending callbacks from bypassed call_rcu_tasks_generic() invocations,
> as in llist_del_all() and enqueue the callbacks.  A well-placed
> raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rtpcp) should suffice for the serialization.
> The trick is that rcu_barrier_tasks_generic() is not obligated to
> wait on later calls to call_rcu_tasks_generic().
> 
> Is this something that you would be interested in digging into?

Sure, I'll take a look.

Thanks,
Matt

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 10:47 sched_ext/lavd hard lockup in old call_rcu_tasks_generic needadjust path Matt Fleming
2026-06-09 11:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-11 13:02   ` Matt Fleming
2026-06-11 13:45     ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-12 10:55       ` Matt Fleming
2026-06-12 14:00         ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-16 10:56           ` Matt Fleming
2026-06-17  3:24             ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-18  6:56               ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2026-06-18 15:55                 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajOWZ3JvlmihMNAH@matt-Precision-5490 \
    --to=matt@readmodwrite.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox