The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86: Add a per-vendor callback to setup EFER caps
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 07:01:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak5YUdHyA36ogsvD@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO9r8zPdJHE=ztF8enA58EbR3iy4_Urhc93RkHiS2HkEsDkS_A@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 2:56 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > Move handling EFER.SVME and EFER.LMSLE from hardware setup to a new
> > > optional per-vendor callback invoked from kvm_setup_efer_caps(). This
> > > centralizes allowed EFER bits handling to kvm_setup_efer_caps(),
> > > facilitating following changes to move efer_reserved_bits into kvm_caps.
> > >
> > > Move the call to kvm_setup_efer_caps() after per-vendor ops are
> > > initialized.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > index a0b2c40d93c21..a297a77469b38 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > @@ -6903,6 +6903,8 @@ static void kvm_setup_efer_caps(void)
> > >
> > >       if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_AUTOIBRS))
> > >               kvm_enable_efer_bits(EFER_AUTOIBRS);
> > > +
> > > +     kvm_x86_call(setup_efer_caps)();
> >
> > I would rather move the togging to kvm_setup_efer_caps(), e.g.
> 
> I didn't do it this way because it creates a dependency on SVM setting
> the X86_FEATURE_SVM cap before kvm_setup_efer_caps() is called.

For all intents and purposes, that dependency already exists due to the
X86_FEATURE_{NX,FXSR_OPT,AUTOIBRS} checks.  And thanks to kvm_is_configuring_cpu_caps,
it's "impossible" for those caps to be toggled outside of svm_set_cpu_caps().

> e.g. it would break if the call to kvm_setup_efer_caps() is moved
> before the vendor-specific hardware_setup(). 

As above, that would break for other reasons.

> Maybe that's fine, but it just seemed like the dependency can be easily
> avoided here by adding a new vendor-specific callback.

No, all it does is change what can go wrong.   E.g. if KVM cleared "nested" in
svm_hardware_setup(), which is *very* realistic given that we carry an internal
patch to disable nested if TDP is disabled, then hoisting kvm_setup_efer_caps()
above ops->hardware_setup() would still break (even ignoring the above issues).

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06 19:54 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: EFER validity fixes and cleanups Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Check EFER validity on KVM_SET_SREGS* Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: SVM: Disallow EFER.SVME and EFER.LSMLE if nested is disabled Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: x86: Disallow EFER.LME and EFER.LMA if long mode is not supported Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86: Add a per-vendor callback to setup EFER caps Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-07 21:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 22:29     ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-08 14:01       ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-07-08 19:12         ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-08 20:56           ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-08 21:34             ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: x86: Reverse the polarity of efer_reserved_bits Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-10 10:23   ` Nikolay Borisov
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: x86: Move supported EFER bits to kvm_caps Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-10 12:56   ` Nikolay Borisov
2026-07-06 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: Extend set_sregs test to cover EFER Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ak5YUdHyA36ogsvD@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox