From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 21:25:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alB0VfK5n3PsE8oK@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709095613.831769-3-amhetre@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 09:56:09AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> Nvidia Tegra264 SMMU is affected by an erratum where a TLB entry can
> survive an invalidation that races with concurrent traffic targeting
> the same entry. The hardware-recommended software workaround is to
> issue every CFGI/TLBI command (each followed by CMD_SYNC) twice, and
> that infrastructure is already in place behind
> arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key.
>
> Neither IDR nor IIDR flags this Tegra264-specific bug, so hardware
> detection is not possible. Tegra264 is device-tree-only (no ACPI/IORT
> support) and already has a dedicated "nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible,
> so DT-probe is the only viable detection path.
>
> Enable the workaround on instances matching the existing
> "nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible by calling static_branch_enable() on
> arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key. Document the erratum in
> Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Sashiko pointed out a concern at PATCH-3 regarding the static key:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709095613.831769-1-amhetre%40nvidia.com
It's a false positive. But perhaps we could fold in an inline note;
it'd belong to the missing description that I commented in PATCH-2.
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 9:56 [PATCH v5 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-09 9:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-10 4:20 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-10 6:35 ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-09 9:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-10 4:25 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-07-10 6:36 ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-10 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Nicolin Chen
2026-07-10 6:39 ` Ashish Mhetre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alB0VfK5n3PsE8oK@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox