The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
	Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>,
	Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	Devendra K Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Snapshot the v0 interrupt status once per handler pass
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 09:44:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alJW5hjfWklqPgzf@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710080903.2392888-7-den@valinux.co.jp>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 05:09:02PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> The v0 interrupt handler reads the interrupt status register twice per
> invocation, once through the DONE accessor and once through the ABORT
> accessor, although both fields live in the same 32-bit register. On
> remote setups (dw-edma-pcie) each read is a non-posted round trip across
> the PCIe link costing on the order of a microsecond, and with one
> completion interrupt per element the duplicate adds up. As an example,
> profiling the R-Car S4 remote path put the handler at ~7us per
> invocation, dominated by such reads.
>
> Read the register once and derive the DONE and ABORT views from the
> snapshot. No abort is lost to this because the pass only clears status
> bits it observed, so an abort raised after the snapshot keeps its status
> and its own interrupt delivery brings it to the next pass. A second
> abort on an observed channel cannot race the clear either, as an aborted
> channel stays halted until software restarts it, and any restart follows
> the abort() handling, which comes after
> dw_edma_v0_core_clear_abort_int().
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>

> Changes in v2:
>   - New patch in v2, posted as part of this preparation series.
>
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> index cfdd6463252e..377812eaa110 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> @@ -218,18 +218,6 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_clear_abort_int(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
>  		  FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK, BIT(chan->id)));
>  }
>
> -static u32 dw_edma_v0_core_status_done_int(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir)
> -{
> -	return FIELD_GET(EDMA_V0_DONE_INT_MASK,
> -			 GET_RW_32(dw, dir, int_status));
> -}
> -
> -static u32 dw_edma_v0_core_status_abort_int(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir)
> -{
> -	return FIELD_GET(EDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK,
> -			 GET_RW_32(dw, dir, int_status));
> -}
> -
>  static irqreturn_t
>  dw_edma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
>  			   dw_edma_handler_t done, dw_edma_handler_t abort)
> @@ -239,7 +227,7 @@ dw_edma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
>  	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>  	struct dw_edma_chan *chan;
>  	unsigned long off;
> -	u32 mask;
> +	u32 mask, sts;
>
>  	if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
>  		total = dw->wr_ch_cnt;
> @@ -251,7 +239,17 @@ dw_edma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
>  		mask = dw_irq->rd_mask;
>  	}
>
> -	val = dw_edma_v0_core_status_done_int(dw, dir);
> +	/*
> +	 * DONE and ABORT status share one register, and on remote setups
> +	 * every read is a non-posted round trip across the PCIe link. Take
> +	 * one snapshot and derive both views from it. An abort raised
> +	 * after the snapshot is deferred, not lost: only bits observed in
> +	 * the snapshot are ever cleared below, so its status survives for
> +	 * the next invocation, which its own interrupt delivery triggers.
> +	 */
> +	sts = GET_RW_32(dw, dir, int_status);
> +
> +	val = FIELD_GET(EDMA_V0_DONE_INT_MASK, sts);
>  	val &= mask;
>  	for_each_set_bit(pos, &val, total) {
>  		chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
> @@ -262,7 +260,7 @@ dw_edma_v0_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
>  		ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>  	}
>
> -	val = dw_edma_v0_core_status_abort_int(dw, dir);
> +	val = FIELD_GET(EDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK, sts);
>  	val &= mask;
>  	for_each_set_bit(pos, &val, total) {
>  		chan = &dw->chan[pos + off];
> --
> 2.51.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-11 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-10  8:08 [PATCH 0/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fixes and interrupt-path groundwork Koichiro Den
2026-07-10  8:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix HDMA channel status register access Koichiro Den
2026-07-10 21:26   ` Frank Li
2026-07-10  8:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Terminate STOP requests without callbacks Koichiro Den
2026-07-11 14:27   ` Frank Li
2026-07-10  8:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Clean up vchan descriptors on termination Koichiro Den
2026-07-11 14:39   ` Frank Li
2026-07-10  8:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Serialize channel state checks Koichiro Den
2026-07-10  8:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: Drop redundant pci_free_irq_vectors() Koichiro Den
2026-07-11 14:41   ` Frank Li
2026-07-10  8:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Snapshot the v0 interrupt status once per handler pass Koichiro Den
2026-07-11 14:44   ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-07-10  8:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] dmaengine: dw-edma: Defer channel IRQ handling to workqueue Koichiro Den
2026-07-11 14:55   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alJW5hjfWklqPgzf@SMW015318 \
    --to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=cai.huoqing@linux.dev \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=devendra.verma@amd.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox