* [PATCH v5] i2c: i2c-gpio: Enhance driver for buses with shared SCL
@ 2026-07-13 6:20 Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-13 13:13 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Markus Stockhausen @ 2026-07-13 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wsa+renesas, andi.shyti, linusw, brgl, linux-i2c, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel
Cc: Markus Stockhausen, Sander Vanheule, Bartosz Golaszewski
Some lower end hardware (especially Realtek based switches) are
designed with multiple I2C buses that share a single clock line.
E.g. the D-Link DGS-1250-28X realizes 4 I2C SFP busses with 5 gpios.
Enhance the i2c-gpio driver so it can handle such hardware designs.
- Detect GPIOs that are used by multiple I2C buses in the dts by
using a unique identifier for each managed SCL.
- The first probing instance allocates and requests the shared SCL
GPIO plus an associated rt_mutex. Subsequent instances detect the
existing entry via the identifier and increment a reference count
to reuse the descriptor.
- All data transfers are serialized via custom lock_ops that handle
both the standard adapter bus lock and the shared SCL mutex. This
ensures mutual exclusion across adapters sharing the clock line.
This patch was successfully tested on Linksys LGS310C that has two
SFP slots with two GPIO based I2C buses that share a sinlge SCL.
Test environment: OpenWrt snapshot ported to kernel 6.19.14
including CONFIG_GPIO_SHARED=y and CONFIG_GPIO_SHARED_PROXY=y.
Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
v4 -> v5
- Whitespace cleanup
- Send to LKML for Sashiko review
- Add Reviewed-by
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20260709062534.2864521-1-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de/
v3 -> v4
- add Reviewed-by and Tested-by
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20260520173129.1382489-1-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de/
v2 -> v3
- Fix lockdep_set_class() with DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20260518161013.900504-1-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de/
v1 -> v2
- Convert fault injector to scl->gpio (reported by test robot)
- Use rt_mutex and i2c_lock_operations instead of pre/post_xfer
(logic taken from i2c-cht-wc.c and enhanced)
- i2c_gpio_lookup_scl()
- Improve list control flow
- Improve comment
- Carve out SCL node comparison into i2c_gpio_scl_matches()
- Drop "valid" attribute and directly check gpiod instead
- Improve fwnode args check for #gpio-cells=1 case
- Add sda/scl cleanup during probe failures
- Replace dev_info() with dev_dbg()
- Reflect changed locking in commmit message
- Tested with config option GPIO_SHARED/GPIO_SHARED_PROXY
as requested by Bartosz
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20260514092042.3265986-1-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de/
v0 -> v1
- Initially this enhancement was submitted as a new driver with
a new devicetree structure. After some discussion Wolfram
advised to make only an enhancement to the i2c-gpio driver.
v0: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20260511162528.84508-1-markus.stockhausen@gmx.de/
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 194 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
index f4355b17bfbf..14b1331f7a96 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
@@ -18,9 +18,23 @@
#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+static LIST_HEAD(i2c_gpio_scl_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(i2c_gpio_scl_list_lock);
+static struct lock_class_key i2c_gpio_scl_lock_key;
+
+struct i2c_gpio_scl_data {
+ struct fwnode_handle *fw_node;
+ u32 fw_pin;
+ u32 fw_flags;
+ struct gpio_desc *gpio;
+ struct rt_mutex lock;
+ refcount_t ref;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
struct i2c_gpio_private_data {
struct gpio_desc *sda;
- struct gpio_desc *scl;
+ struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *scl;
struct i2c_adapter adap;
struct i2c_algo_bit_data bit_data;
struct i2c_gpio_platform_data pdata;
@@ -31,6 +45,11 @@ struct i2c_gpio_private_data {
#endif
};
+static inline struct i2c_gpio_private_data *adap_to_priv(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+{
+ return container_of(adap, struct i2c_gpio_private_data, adap);
+}
+
/*
* Toggle SDA by changing the output value of the pin. This is only
* valid for pins configured as open drain (i.e. setting the value
@@ -53,7 +72,7 @@ static void i2c_gpio_setscl_val(void *data, int state)
{
struct i2c_gpio_private_data *priv = data;
- gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->scl, state);
+ gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->scl->gpio, state);
}
static int i2c_gpio_getsda(void *data)
@@ -67,9 +86,41 @@ static int i2c_gpio_getscl(void *data)
{
struct i2c_gpio_private_data *priv = data;
- return gpiod_get_value_cansleep(priv->scl);
+ return gpiod_get_value_cansleep(priv->scl->gpio);
+}
+
+static void i2c_gpio_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ /* Take care about adapter lock. See i2c_adapter_lock_bus() and others. */
+ rt_mutex_lock_nested(&adap->bus_lock, i2c_adapter_depth(adap));
+ rt_mutex_lock(&adap_to_priv(adap)->scl->lock);
+}
+
+static int i2c_gpio_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ if (!rt_mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!rt_mutex_trylock(&adap_to_priv(adap)->scl->lock)) {
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static void i2c_gpio_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap_to_priv(adap)->scl->lock);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
}
+static const struct i2c_lock_operations i2c_gpio_lock_ops = {
+ .lock_bus = i2c_gpio_lock_bus,
+ .trylock_bus = i2c_gpio_trylock_bus,
+ .unlock_bus = i2c_gpio_unlock_bus,
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_GPIO_FAULT_INJECTOR
#define setsda(bd, val) ((bd)->setsda((bd)->data, val))
@@ -165,14 +216,14 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_incomplete_write_byte, NULL, fops_incomplete_write
static int i2c_gpio_fi_act_on_scl_irq(struct i2c_gpio_private_data *priv,
irqreturn_t handler(int, void*))
{
- int ret, irq = gpiod_to_irq(priv->scl);
+ int ret, irq = gpiod_to_irq(priv->scl->gpio);
if (irq < 0)
return irq;
i2c_lock_bus(&priv->adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
- ret = gpiod_direction_input(priv->scl);
+ ret = gpiod_direction_input(priv->scl->gpio);
if (ret)
goto unlock;
@@ -187,7 +238,7 @@ static int i2c_gpio_fi_act_on_scl_irq(struct i2c_gpio_private_data *priv,
free_irq(irq, priv);
output:
- ret = gpiod_direction_output(priv->scl, 1) ?: ret;
+ ret = gpiod_direction_output(priv->scl->gpio, 1) ?: ret;
unlock:
i2c_unlock_bus(&priv->adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
@@ -308,13 +359,17 @@ static struct gpio_desc *i2c_gpio_get_desc(struct device *dev,
struct gpio_desc *retdesc;
int ret;
- retdesc = devm_gpiod_get(dev, con_id, gflags);
+ /*
+ * Don't use resource-managed functions. SCL may be shared across adapters and has
+ * its own lifetime management. SDA uses the same path for consistency.
+ */
+ retdesc = gpiod_get(dev, con_id, gflags);
if (!IS_ERR(retdesc)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "got GPIO from name %s\n", con_id);
return retdesc;
}
- retdesc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, index, gflags);
+ retdesc = gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, index, gflags);
if (!IS_ERR(retdesc)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "got GPIO from index %u\n", index);
return retdesc;
@@ -336,6 +391,118 @@ static struct gpio_desc *i2c_gpio_get_desc(struct device *dev,
return retdesc;
}
+static struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *i2c_gpio_create_scl(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+{
+ struct fwnode_reference_args args;
+ struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *scl;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(fwnode, "scl-gpios",
+ "#gpio-cells", 0, 0, &args);
+ if (ret)
+ /* try the ancient way */
+ ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(fwnode, "gpios",
+ "#gpio-cells", 0, 1, &args);
+ if (ret)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+ if (args.nargs < 1) {
+ fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ scl = kzalloc(sizeof(*scl), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!scl) {
+ fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+
+ /* The unique identification from the SCL GPIO reference in the device tree */
+ scl->fw_node = args.fwnode;
+ scl->fw_pin = args.args[0];
+ scl->fw_flags = (args.nargs >= 2) ? args.args[1] : 0;
+
+ rt_mutex_init(&scl->lock);
+ lockdep_set_class(&scl->lock, &i2c_gpio_scl_lock_key);
+ refcount_set(&scl->ref, 1);
+
+ return scl;
+}
+
+static void i2c_gpio_free_scl(struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *scl)
+{
+ fwnode_handle_put(scl->fw_node);
+ kfree(scl);
+}
+
+static bool i2c_gpio_scl_matches(struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *a, struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *b)
+{
+ return a->fw_node == b->fw_node && a->fw_pin == b->fw_pin && a->fw_flags == b->fw_flags;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Look up an existing or create a new shared SCL structure described by the device's fwnode.
+ * Optimistic setup sequence always creates and tries to add a new entry to the list. This uses
+ * minimum locking and afterwards requests the GPIO without a lock held. Concurrent probes for
+ * the same SCL pin see the entry and do not race into a second gpiod_get(). Until everything
+ * is setup they terminate with -EPROBE_DEFER.
+ */
+static struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *i2c_gpio_lookup_scl(struct device *dev, enum gpiod_flags gflags)
+{
+ struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *scl, *new_scl;
+ struct gpio_desc *gpio;
+
+ new_scl = i2c_gpio_create_scl(dev_fwnode(dev));
+ if (IS_ERR(new_scl))
+ return new_scl;
+
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &i2c_gpio_scl_list_lock) {
+ list_for_each_entry(scl, &i2c_gpio_scl_list, list) {
+ if (!i2c_gpio_scl_matches(scl, new_scl))
+ continue;
+
+ i2c_gpio_free_scl(new_scl);
+ if (!scl->gpio)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+
+ refcount_inc(&scl->ref);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "reusing shared SCL (%pfwP, pin %u)\n",
+ scl->fw_node, scl->fw_pin);
+
+ return scl;
+ }
+ list_add(&new_scl->list, &i2c_gpio_scl_list);
+ }
+
+ gpio = i2c_gpio_get_desc(dev, "scl", 1, gflags);
+ if (IS_ERR(gpio)) {
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &i2c_gpio_scl_list_lock)
+ list_del(&new_scl->list);
+ i2c_gpio_free_scl(new_scl);
+
+ return ERR_CAST(gpio);
+ }
+
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &i2c_gpio_scl_list_lock)
+ new_scl->gpio = gpio;
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "registered shared SCL (%pfwP, pin %u)\n",
+ new_scl->fw_node, new_scl->fw_pin);
+
+ return new_scl;
+}
+
+static void i2c_gpio_cleanup_scl(struct i2c_gpio_scl_data *scl)
+{
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&scl->ref, &i2c_gpio_scl_list_lock))
+ return;
+
+ list_del(&scl->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&i2c_gpio_scl_list_lock);
+ gpiod_put(scl->gpio);
+ i2c_gpio_free_scl(scl);
+}
+
static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct i2c_gpio_private_data *priv;
@@ -386,11 +553,13 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
else
gflags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH_OPEN_DRAIN;
- priv->scl = i2c_gpio_get_desc(dev, "scl", 1, gflags);
- if (IS_ERR(priv->scl))
- return PTR_ERR(priv->scl);
+ priv->scl = i2c_gpio_lookup_scl(dev, gflags);
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->scl)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(priv->scl);
+ goto err_cleanup_sda;
+ }
- if (gpiod_cansleep(priv->sda) || gpiod_cansleep(priv->scl))
+ if (gpiod_cansleep(priv->sda) || gpiod_cansleep(priv->scl->gpio))
dev_warn(dev, "Slow GPIO pins might wreak havoc into I2C/SMBus bus timing");
else
bit_data->can_do_atomic = true;
@@ -423,6 +592,8 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
else
snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-gpio%d", pdev->id);
+ /* Always use shared SCL aware locking */
+ adap->lock_ops = &i2c_gpio_lock_ops;
adap->algo_data = bit_data;
adap->class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON;
adap->dev.parent = dev;
@@ -431,7 +602,7 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
adap->nr = pdev->id;
ret = i2c_bit_add_numbered_bus(adap);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto err_cleanup_scl;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
@@ -441,13 +612,20 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* from the descriptor, then provide that instead.
*/
dev_info(dev, "using lines %u (SDA) and %u (SCL%s)\n",
- desc_to_gpio(priv->sda), desc_to_gpio(priv->scl),
+ desc_to_gpio(priv->sda), desc_to_gpio(priv->scl->gpio),
pdata->scl_is_output_only
? ", no clock stretching" : "");
i2c_gpio_fault_injector_init(pdev);
return 0;
+
+err_cleanup_scl:
+ i2c_gpio_cleanup_scl(priv->scl);
+err_cleanup_sda:
+ gpiod_put(priv->sda);
+
+ return ret;
}
static void i2c_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -459,6 +637,8 @@ static void i2c_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
adap = &priv->adap;
i2c_del_adapter(adap);
+ i2c_gpio_cleanup_scl(priv->scl);
+ gpiod_put(priv->sda);
}
static const struct of_device_id i2c_gpio_dt_ids[] = {
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: i2c-gpio: Enhance driver for buses with shared SCL
2026-07-13 6:20 [PATCH v5] i2c: i2c-gpio: Enhance driver for buses with shared SCL Markus Stockhausen
@ 2026-07-13 13:13 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2026-07-13 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Stockhausen
Cc: andi.shyti, linusw, brgl, linux-i2c, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
Sander Vanheule, Bartosz Golaszewski
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 546 bytes --]
Hi Markus,
> - Send to LKML for Sashiko review
So, the review is here[1] now and it is fortunately not complaining
much. About the first issue ('bit_test'), I could imagine we add another
bool to 'struct i2c_algo_bit_data' like 'disallow_bit_test' and bail out
early if it is set? I didn't dive into the second issue ('ENOENT')
because I guess this is just a little extra handling. And you are more
into the details anyhow.
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713062021.2995641-1-markus.stockhausen%40gmx.de
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-13 13:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-13 6:20 [PATCH v5] i2c: i2c-gpio: Enhance driver for buses with shared SCL Markus Stockhausen
2026-07-13 13:13 ` Wolfram Sang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox