From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix hwpoison code related build failure on 32-bit NUMAQ
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:43:37 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0909261038510.3303@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090926173522.GA22723@elte.hu>
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > +config X86_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
> > + bool
> > + depends on !X86_NUMAQ
> > + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
> > + default y
>
> Thanks Linus, this patch fixed the NUMAQ build problem.
I think it's slightly buggy still.
I think the X86_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE thing should also have a
depends on X86_MCE
line, because we still depend on MCE.
And as you found out, there's also the sparsemem thing.
Don't make it one huge ugly thing, just split out the requirements like
depends on X86_MCE
depends on !X86_NUMAQ
depends on X86_64 || !SPARSEMEM
because I think the requirements are fairly independent, and it makes it
easier to read (you could even comment each line on why _that_ particular
issue needs to disable X86_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE)
But yeah, with that, and some testing, please add my sign-off (or
acked-by, if you end up changing the patch so much that it has little to
do with my original one)
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-26 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 12:51 [PULL] Please pull hwpoison code for 2.6.32 Andi Kleen
2009-09-26 14:13 ` [origin tree build failure] " Ingo Molnar
2009-09-26 15:17 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-26 16:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-26 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-26 18:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-26 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-26 17:35 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix hwpoison code related build failure on 32-bit NUMAQ Ingo Molnar
2009-09-26 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-09-26 18:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-26 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-26 18:11 ` [origin tree build failure] Re: [PULL] Please pull hwpoison code for 2.6.32 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0909261038510.3303@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox