The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers
@ 2026-07-23  6:10 Praveen Talari
  2026-07-23 14:29 ` Brian Masney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Praveen Talari @ 2026-07-23  6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bjorn.andersson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Brian Masney,
	konrad.dybcio
  Cc: mukesh.savaliya, linux-clk, linux-kernel, chandana.chiluveru,
	Praveen Talari

clk_round_rate() only checks for a NULL clk pointer before
dereferencing it, but callers such as dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can pass
it an error pointer (e.g. ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) left behind by
clk_get() when a device has no Linux clock and is instead managed by
firmware via a genpd/OPP performance domain).

Dereferencing that error pointer to read clk->exclusive_count
crashes with an unhandled kernel NULL pointer dereference, since
ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) plus the field's offset lands on a small, unmapped
address:

  Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
  address 000000000000002e
  ...
  pc : clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188
  ...
  Call trace:
   clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188 (P)
   dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x114/0x33c

Change the guard from "if (!clk)" to "if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))",
matching the pattern already used by other clk consumer API
functions such as clk_unprepare(), so an error pointer is rejected
the same way a NULL pointer is.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 048adfa86a5d..8c1ad3d10284 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
 	struct clk_rate_request req;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!clk)
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))
 		return 0;
 
 	clk_prepare_lock();

---
base-commit: b4515cf4156356e8f4fe6e0fdc17f59adab9772f
change-id: 20260723-fix_ptr_check_on_clk-603605c3e350

Best regards,
--  
Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers
  2026-07-23  6:10 [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers Praveen Talari
@ 2026-07-23 14:29 ` Brian Masney
  2026-07-23 16:40   ` Praveen Talari
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Masney @ 2026-07-23 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Praveen Talari
  Cc: bjorn.andersson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, konrad.dybcio,
	mukesh.savaliya, linux-clk, linux-kernel, chandana.chiluveru

Hi Praveen,

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:40:47AM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
> clk_round_rate() only checks for a NULL clk pointer before
> dereferencing it, but callers such as dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can pass
> it an error pointer (e.g. ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) left behind by
> clk_get() when a device has no Linux clock and is instead managed by
> firmware via a genpd/OPP performance domain).
> 
> Dereferencing that error pointer to read clk->exclusive_count
> crashes with an unhandled kernel NULL pointer dereference, since
> ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) plus the field's offset lands on a small, unmapped
> address:
> 
>   Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
>   address 000000000000002e
>   ...
>   pc : clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188
>   ...
>   Call trace:
>    clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188 (P)
>    dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x114/0x33c
> 
> Change the guard from "if (!clk)" to "if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))",
> matching the pattern already used by other clk consumer API
> functions such as clk_unprepare(), so an error pointer is rejected
> the same way a NULL pointer is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 048adfa86a5d..8c1ad3d10284 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>  	struct clk_rate_request req;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!clk)
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))

Can you provide more details about the clk_get() call point that starts this
error? Specifically which driver this occurs in and the exact scenario that
triggers this.

Brian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers
  2026-07-23 14:29 ` Brian Masney
@ 2026-07-23 16:40   ` Praveen Talari
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Praveen Talari @ 2026-07-23 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brian Masney
  Cc: bjorn.andersson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, konrad.dybcio,
	mukesh.savaliya, linux-clk, linux-kernel, chandana.chiluveru

Hi Brian,

On 23-07-2026 19:59, Brian Masney wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:40:47AM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
>> clk_round_rate() only checks for a NULL clk pointer before
>> dereferencing it, but callers such as dev_pm_opp_set_rate() can pass
>> it an error pointer (e.g. ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) left behind by
>> clk_get() when a device has no Linux clock and is instead managed by
>> firmware via a genpd/OPP performance domain).
>>
>> Dereferencing that error pointer to read clk->exclusive_count
>> crashes with an unhandled kernel NULL pointer dereference, since
>> ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) plus the field's offset lands on a small, unmapped
>> address:
>>
>>    Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
>>    address 000000000000002e
>>    ...
>>    pc : clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188
>>    ...
>>    Call trace:
>>     clk_round_rate+0x3c/0x188 (P)
>>     dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x114/0x33c
>>
>> Change the guard from "if (!clk)" to "if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))",
>> matching the pattern already used by other clk consumer API
>> functions such as clk_unprepare(), so an error pointer is rejected
>> the same way a NULL pointer is.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index 048adfa86a5d..8c1ad3d10284 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>>   	struct clk_rate_request req;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> -	if (!clk)
>> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))
> Can you provide more details about the clk_get() call point that starts this
> error? Specifically which driver this occurs in and the exact scenario that
> triggers this.

On SA8255P platform there is no Linux
clock for the SE, and the perf domain device's OPPs are populated entirely
from firmware via devm_pm_opp_of_add_table() (through
of_genpd_add_provider_simple()/onecell()), so the perf domain's OPP table
has entries even though no clk_get() ever succeeds for it.

The clk_get(-ENOENT) case comes from _update_opp_table_clk() in
drivers/opp/core.c:

     opp_table->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
     ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_table->clk);
     ...
     if (ret == -ENOENT) {
         /* ... no clk provided ... */
         opp_table->clk_count = 1;
         return opp_table;   /* opp_table->clk left as ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) */
     }

Because the perf domain device has no "clocks" property (its OPPs are
supplied purely as performance states by firmware/genpd), clk_get()
returns -ENOENT, and opp_table->clk is left holding that error pointer
rather than being reset to NULL.


Praveen

>
> Brian
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-23 16:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-23  6:10 [PATCH] clk: Guard clk_round_rate() against error pointers Praveen Talari
2026-07-23 14:29 ` Brian Masney
2026-07-23 16:40   ` Praveen Talari

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox