The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH v 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers
@ 2026-07-27 12:23 Oleg Nesterov
  2026-07-27 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
  2026-07-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-07-27 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Mateusz Guzik, Jens Axboe
  Cc: Alexander Viro, Jan Kara, Alexey Gladkov, linux-kernel,
	linux-fsdevel, io-uring

Again, I am not sure this makes a lot of sense. But I'd like to know
your opinion.

Plus I'd like to have the review from sashiko ;)

With or without this patch we need to update the comments to document
that io_uring depends on ->pipe_usage too. And probably rename it to
(say) ->et_poll.

tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c passes.

See also the test-cases in 1/1, they pass with this patch. And fail if
I remove WRITE_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage, true) in pipe_poll().

Oleg.
---

 fs/pipe.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers
  2026-07-27 12:23 [RFC PATCH v 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers Oleg Nesterov
@ 2026-07-27 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
  2026-07-27 12:28   ` Oleg Nesterov
  2026-07-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-07-27 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Mateusz Guzik, Jens Axboe
  Cc: Alexander Viro, Jan Kara, Alexey Gladkov, linux-kernel,
	linux-fsdevel, io-uring

pipe_poll() unconditionally sets poll_usage on the first call, forcing
anon_pipe_write() to wake up readers on every write even if the pipe was
not empty. But this is only needed for edge-triggered consumers: epoll
with EPOLLET and io_uring without (unsupported) IORING_POLL_ADD_LEVEL.
poll() and select() users pay for it for no reason.

Change pipe_poll() to set ->pipe_usage only if wait->_key & EPOLLET is
true, this check should catch both users.

While at it, add READ_ONCE() in anon_pipe_write() to pair with WRITE_ONCE()
in pipe_poll().

Test-case for epoll:

	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/epoll.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		int pfd[2], efd;
		struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET };

		pipe(pfd);
		efd = epoll_create1(0);
		epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfd[0], &evt);

		for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
			write(pfd[1], "", 1);
			assert(epoll_wait(efd, &evt, 1, 0) == 1);
		}

		return 0;
	}

Test-case for io_uring:

	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/mman.h>
	#include <sys/epoll.h>
	#include <sys/syscall.h>
	#include <linux/io_uring.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		struct io_uring_params p = {};
		int fd, pfd[2];

		pipe(pfd);

		fd = syscall(SYS_io_uring_setup, 2, &p);
		assert(fd >= 0);

		void *ring = mmap(0, p.cq_off.cqes + p.cq_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe),
				  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
		assert(ring != MAP_FAILED);
		*(unsigned *)(ring + p.sq_off.tail) = 1;

		struct io_uring_sqe *sqes = mmap(0, p.sq_entries * sizeof(*sqes),
				  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQES);
		assert(sqes != MAP_FAILED);
		sqes[0].opcode = IORING_OP_POLL_ADD;
		sqes[0].fd = pfd[0];
		sqes[0].len = IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI;
		sqes[0].poll32_events = EPOLLIN;

		syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);

		unsigned *cq_head = ring + p.cq_off.head;
		unsigned *cq_tail = ring + p.cq_off.tail;
		for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
			write(pfd[1], "", 1);
			syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 0, 0, IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS, 0, 0);
			assert(*cq_tail == ++*cq_head);
		}

		return 0;
	}

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 fs/pipe.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 429b0714ec57..98b1e2385103 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ anon_pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	 * Epoll nonsensically wants a wakeup whether the pipe
 	 * was already empty or not.
 	 */
-	if (was_empty || pipe->poll_usage)
+	if (was_empty || READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage))
 		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->rd_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
 	kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 	if (wake_next_writer)
@@ -752,7 +752,6 @@ static long pipe_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 	}
 }
 
-/* No kernel lock held - fine */
 static __poll_t
 pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
 {
@@ -761,7 +760,9 @@ pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
 	union pipe_index idx;
 
 	/* Epoll has some historical nasty semantics, this enables them */
-	if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
+	if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ) &&
+	    wait && (wait->_key & EPOLLET) &&
+	    unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
 		WRITE_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage, true);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.52.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers
  2026-07-27 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
@ 2026-07-27 12:28   ` Oleg Nesterov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-07-27 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Mateusz Guzik, Jens Axboe
  Cc: Alexander Viro, Jan Kara, Alexey Gladkov, linux-kernel,
	linux-fsdevel, io-uring

Damn, sorry, the subject is wrong... ignore, will resend

On 07/27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> pipe_poll() unconditionally sets poll_usage on the first call, forcing
> anon_pipe_write() to wake up readers on every write even if the pipe was
> not empty. But this is only needed for edge-triggered consumers: epoll
> with EPOLLET and io_uring without (unsupported) IORING_POLL_ADD_LEVEL.
> poll() and select() users pay for it for no reason.
> 
> Change pipe_poll() to set ->pipe_usage only if wait->_key & EPOLLET is
> true, this check should catch both users.
> 
> While at it, add READ_ONCE() in anon_pipe_write() to pair with WRITE_ONCE()
> in pipe_poll().
> 
> Test-case for epoll:
> 
> 	#include <unistd.h>
> 	#include <sys/epoll.h>
> 	#include <assert.h>
> 
> 	int main(void)
> 	{
> 		int pfd[2], efd;
> 		struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET };
> 
> 		pipe(pfd);
> 		efd = epoll_create1(0);
> 		epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfd[0], &evt);
> 
> 		for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
> 			write(pfd[1], "", 1);
> 			assert(epoll_wait(efd, &evt, 1, 0) == 1);
> 		}
> 
> 		return 0;
> 	}
> 
> Test-case for io_uring:
> 
> 	#include <unistd.h>
> 	#include <sys/mman.h>
> 	#include <sys/epoll.h>
> 	#include <sys/syscall.h>
> 	#include <linux/io_uring.h>
> 	#include <assert.h>
> 
> 	int main(void)
> 	{
> 		struct io_uring_params p = {};
> 		int fd, pfd[2];
> 
> 		pipe(pfd);
> 
> 		fd = syscall(SYS_io_uring_setup, 2, &p);
> 		assert(fd >= 0);
> 
> 		void *ring = mmap(0, p.cq_off.cqes + p.cq_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe),
> 				  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
> 		assert(ring != MAP_FAILED);
> 		*(unsigned *)(ring + p.sq_off.tail) = 1;
> 
> 		struct io_uring_sqe *sqes = mmap(0, p.sq_entries * sizeof(*sqes),
> 				  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQES);
> 		assert(sqes != MAP_FAILED);
> 		sqes[0].opcode = IORING_OP_POLL_ADD;
> 		sqes[0].fd = pfd[0];
> 		sqes[0].len = IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI;
> 		sqes[0].poll32_events = EPOLLIN;
> 
> 		syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> 
> 		unsigned *cq_head = ring + p.cq_off.head;
> 		unsigned *cq_tail = ring + p.cq_off.tail;
> 		for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
> 			write(pfd[1], "", 1);
> 			syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 0, 0, IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS, 0, 0);
> 			assert(*cq_tail == ++*cq_head);
> 		}
> 
> 		return 0;
> 	}
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/pipe.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> index 429b0714ec57..98b1e2385103 100644
> --- a/fs/pipe.c
> +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ anon_pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>  	 * Epoll nonsensically wants a wakeup whether the pipe
>  	 * was already empty or not.
>  	 */
> -	if (was_empty || pipe->poll_usage)
> +	if (was_empty || READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage))
>  		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->rd_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
>  	kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
>  	if (wake_next_writer)
> @@ -752,7 +752,6 @@ static long pipe_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -/* No kernel lock held - fine */
>  static __poll_t
>  pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
>  {
> @@ -761,7 +760,9 @@ pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
>  	union pipe_index idx;
>  
>  	/* Epoll has some historical nasty semantics, this enables them */
> -	if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
> +	if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ) &&
> +	    wait && (wait->_key & EPOLLET) &&
> +	    unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
>  		WRITE_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage, true);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers
  2026-07-27 12:23 [RFC PATCH v 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers Oleg Nesterov
  2026-07-27 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
@ 2026-07-27 12:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-07-27 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Breno Leitao, Christian Brauner, Mateusz Guzik, Jens Axboe
  Cc: Alexander Viro, Jan Kara, Alexey Gladkov, linux-kernel,
	linux-fsdevel, io-uring

pipe_poll() unconditionally sets poll_usage on the first call, forcing
anon_pipe_write() to wake up readers on every write even if the pipe was
not empty. But this is only needed for edge-triggered consumers: epoll
with EPOLLET and io_uring without (unsupported) IORING_POLL_ADD_LEVEL.
poll() and select() users pay for it for no reason.

Change pipe_poll() to set ->pipe_usage only if wait->_key & EPOLLET is
true, this check should catch both users.

While at it, add READ_ONCE() in anon_pipe_write() to pair with WRITE_ONCE()
in pipe_poll().

Test-case for epoll:

	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/epoll.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		int pfd[2], efd;
		struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET };

		pipe(pfd);
		efd = epoll_create1(0);
		epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfd[0], &evt);

		for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
			write(pfd[1], "", 1);
			assert(epoll_wait(efd, &evt, 1, 0) == 1);
		}

		return 0;
	}

Test-case for io_uring:

	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/mman.h>
	#include <sys/epoll.h>
	#include <sys/syscall.h>
	#include <linux/io_uring.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		struct io_uring_params p = {};
		int fd, pfd[2];

		pipe(pfd);

		fd = syscall(SYS_io_uring_setup, 2, &p);
		assert(fd >= 0);

		void *ring = mmap(0, p.cq_off.cqes + p.cq_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe),
				  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQ_RING);
		assert(ring != MAP_FAILED);
		*(unsigned *)(ring + p.sq_off.tail) = 1;

		struct io_uring_sqe *sqes = mmap(0, p.sq_entries * sizeof(*sqes),
				  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, IORING_OFF_SQES);
		assert(sqes != MAP_FAILED);
		sqes[0].opcode = IORING_OP_POLL_ADD;
		sqes[0].fd = pfd[0];
		sqes[0].len = IORING_POLL_ADD_MULTI;
		sqes[0].poll32_events = EPOLLIN;

		syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);

		unsigned *cq_head = ring + p.cq_off.head;
		unsigned *cq_tail = ring + p.cq_off.tail;
		for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
			write(pfd[1], "", 1);
			syscall(SYS_io_uring_enter, fd, 0, 0, IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS, 0, 0);
			assert(*cq_tail == ++*cq_head);
		}

		return 0;
	}

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 fs/pipe.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 429b0714ec57..98b1e2385103 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ anon_pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	 * Epoll nonsensically wants a wakeup whether the pipe
 	 * was already empty or not.
 	 */
-	if (was_empty || pipe->poll_usage)
+	if (was_empty || READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage))
 		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->rd_wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
 	kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 	if (wake_next_writer)
@@ -752,7 +752,6 @@ static long pipe_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 	}
 }
 
-/* No kernel lock held - fine */
 static __poll_t
 pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
 {
@@ -761,7 +760,9 @@ pipe_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
 	union pipe_index idx;
 
 	/* Epoll has some historical nasty semantics, this enables them */
-	if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
+	if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ) &&
+	    wait && (wait->_key & EPOLLET) &&
+	    unlikely(!READ_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage)))
 		WRITE_ONCE(pipe->poll_usage, true);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.52.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-27 12:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-27 12:23 [RFC PATCH v 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-27 12:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-27 12:28   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox