* [PATCH] kvm: apply VM_READ/VM_WRITE checks to all VMA types
@ 2026-07-31 17:58 Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-31 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2026-07-31 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, kvm; +Cc: Sean Christopherson
The VM_READ and VM_WRITE flags are checked only at the very end of
hva_to_pfn(). For both the hva_to_pfn_remapped() case and for regular
mappings, this adds unnecessary cases and inconsistent error behavior.
For hva_to_pfn_remapped(), the code is relying on fixup_user_fault() to
detect this situation. This is fragile because hva_to_pfn_remapped()
returns different error codes for a !VM_WRITE VMA depending on whether
the PTE happens to be mapped:
* if the PTE is present, follow_pfnmap_start() sets args.writable to
false and KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT is returned;
* if no PTE is present, fixup_user_fault(FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) returns
-EFAULT after checking vma_permits_fault(), and hva_to_pfn() ends
up returning KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT.
With this patch KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT is returned uniformly. Likewise,
a PROT_NONE pfnmap VMA would be mapped into the guest if the PTE was
pte_present()[1] when the guest attempted to read it; with the patch
instead KVM uniformly returns KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT. Doing the check early
avoids these special cases and also sidesteps the issue pointed out at
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731160514.1101989-1-pbonzini%40redhat.com.
For regular mappings a PROT_READ VMA, if placed in a writable memslot,
would return KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT instead of KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT when
the guest writes to it. This would cause a -EFAULT exit to userspace,
instead of triggering emulation as the VM_IO|VM_PFNMAP arm would do;
however it should be considered part of the KVM API because mmu_stress_test
relies on it.
Still, even with this snag about the returned pfn error code, pull the
vm_flags checks in front so that they are done for all VMAs and the
above inconsistency goes away for the VM_IO|VM_PFNMAP case.
[1] on x86, for example, such a page would have _PAGE_PRESENT clear
but _PAGE_PROTNONE set
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 45e784462ec6..eaf8ee0725d4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2925,17 +2925,6 @@ static int hva_to_pfn_slow(struct kvm_follow_pfn *kfp, kvm_pfn_t *pfn)
return npages;
}
-static bool vma_is_valid(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool write_fault)
-{
- if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)))
- return false;
-
- if (write_fault && (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))))
- return false;
-
- return true;
-}
-
static int hva_to_pfn_remapped(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct kvm_follow_pfn *kfp, kvm_pfn_t *p_pfn)
{
@@ -3008,20 +2997,29 @@ kvm_pfn_t hva_to_pfn(struct kvm_follow_pfn *kfp)
retry:
vma = vma_lookup(current->mm, kfp->hva);
- if (vma == NULL)
+ /*
+ * GUP failed. It could be an inaccessible mapping, a pfnmap one,
+ * or the page might be absent.
+ */
+
+ if (vma == NULL || unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ))) {
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
- else if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)) {
+ } else if ((kfp->flags & FOLL_WRITE) && unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) {
+ /*
+ * Exit to userspace for PROT_READ mappings in a writable
+ * memslot, as this is part of the API.
+ */
+ pfn = vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)
+ ? KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT : KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
+ } else if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)) {
r = hva_to_pfn_remapped(vma, kfp, &pfn);
if (r == -EAGAIN)
goto retry;
if (r < 0)
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
} else {
- if ((kfp->flags & FOLL_NOWAIT) &&
- vma_is_valid(vma, kfp->flags & FOLL_WRITE))
- pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO;
- else
- pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
+ pfn = kfp->flags & FOLL_NOWAIT
+ ? KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO : KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
}
mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
return pfn;
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm: apply VM_READ/VM_WRITE checks to all VMA types
2026-07-31 17:58 [PATCH] kvm: apply VM_READ/VM_WRITE checks to all VMA types Paolo Bonzini
@ 2026-07-31 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2026-07-31 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: linux-kernel, kvm
On Fri, Jul 31, 2026, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The VM_READ and VM_WRITE flags are checked only at the very end of
> hva_to_pfn(). For both the hva_to_pfn_remapped() case and for regular
> mappings, this adds unnecessary cases and inconsistent error behavior.
>
> For hva_to_pfn_remapped(), the code is relying on fixup_user_fault() to
> detect this situation. This is fragile because hva_to_pfn_remapped()
> returns different error codes for a !VM_WRITE VMA depending on whether
> the PTE happens to be mapped:
>
> * if the PTE is present, follow_pfnmap_start() sets args.writable to
> false and KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT is returned;
>
> * if no PTE is present, fixup_user_fault(FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) returns
> -EFAULT after checking vma_permits_fault(), and hva_to_pfn() ends
> up returning KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT.
>
> With this patch KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT is returned uniformly.
IMO, returning KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT on a read-only VMA is wrong. AFAICT, that
behavior for VM_{IO,PFNMAP} was added by commit bd2fae8da794 ("KVM: do not assume
PTE is writable after follow_pfn"). Given that that's the only case where KVM
returns KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT, I would much prefer to fix that wart and cross our
fingers nothing has come to rely on the behavior in the last ~5 years.
> Likewise, a PROT_NONE pfnmap VMA would be mapped into the guest if the PTE
> was pte_present()[1] when the guest attempted to read it; with the patch
> instead KVM uniformly returns KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT. Doing the check early
> avoids these special cases and also sidesteps the issue pointed out at
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731160514.1101989-1-pbonzini%40redhat.com.
>
> For regular mappings a PROT_READ VMA, if placed in a writable memslot,
> would return KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT instead of KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT when
> the guest writes to it. This would cause a -EFAULT exit to userspace,
> instead of triggering emulation as the VM_IO|VM_PFNMAP arm would do;
No, arm64 is checking the memslot, not the VMA.
hva = gfn_to_hva_memslot_prot(memslot, gfn, &writable);
write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
if (kvm_is_error_hva(hva) || (write_fault && !writable)) {
Or are you talking about different code?
> however it should be considered part of the KVM API because mmu_stress_test
> relies on it.
...
> } else {
> - if ((kfp->flags & FOLL_NOWAIT) &&
> - vma_is_valid(vma, kfp->flags & FOLL_WRITE))
> - pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO;
> - else
> - pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
> + pfn = kfp->flags & FOLL_NOWAIT
> + ? KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO : KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
I find this style much easier to read:
pfn = kfp->flags & FOLL_NOWAIT ? KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO :
KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
If we "fix" the read-only behavior, isn't it this?
/*
* GUP failed. It could be an inaccessible mapping, a pfnmap one,
* or the page might be absent.
*/
if (vma == NULL || unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)) ||
((kfp->flags & FOLL_WRITE) && unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)))) {
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
} else if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)) {
r = hva_to_pfn_remapped(vma, kfp, &pfn);
if (r == -EAGAIN)
goto retry;
if (r < 0)
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
} else {
pfn = kfp->flags & FOLL_NOWAIT ? KVM_PFN_ERR_NEEDS_IO :
KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
}
> }
> mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> return pfn;
> --
> 2.55.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-31 18:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-31 17:58 [PATCH] kvm: apply VM_READ/VM_WRITE checks to all VMA types Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-31 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox