The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powerpc: fsl_rio: Use snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup()
@ 2026-06-30 14:49 Thorsten Blum
  2026-08-14 12:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2026-06-30 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin,
	Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Kees Cook
  Cc: Thorsten Blum, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

While the current code works correctly, replace the unbounded sprintf()
with the safer snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup() to follow secure coding
best practices.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
index eb55dabb4748..077c03cd93e4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int fsl_rio_setup(struct platform_device *dev)
 				kfree(port);
 				continue;
 		}
-		sprintf(port->name, "RIO mport %d", i);
+		snprintf(port->name, sizeof(port->name), "RIO mport %d", i);
 
 		priv->dev = &dev->dev;
 		port->dev.parent = &dev->dev;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fsl_rio: Use snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup()
  2026-06-30 14:49 [PATCH] powerpc: fsl_rio: Use snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup() Thorsten Blum
@ 2026-08-14 12:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
  2026-08-14 14:46   ` Thorsten Blum
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-08-14 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thorsten Blum, Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman,
	Nicholas Piggin, Kees Cook
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel



Le 30/06/2026 à 16:49, Thorsten Blum a écrit :
> While the current code works correctly, replace the unbounded sprintf()
> with the safer snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup() to follow secure coding
> best practices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> index eb55dabb4748..077c03cd93e4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int fsl_rio_setup(struct platform_device *dev)
>   				kfree(port);
>   				continue;
>   		}
> -		sprintf(port->name, "RIO mport %d", i);
> +		snprintf(port->name, sizeof(port->name), "RIO mport %d", i);

Are you sure it is correct ?

Shouldn't it be sizeof(port->name) - 1 ?

>   
>   		priv->dev = &dev->dev;
>   		port->dev.parent = &dev->dev;


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fsl_rio: Use snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup()
  2026-08-14 12:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
@ 2026-08-14 14:46   ` Thorsten Blum
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2026-08-14 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
  Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Kees Cook,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 02:26:24PM +0200, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote:
> Le 30/06/2026 à 16:49, Thorsten Blum a écrit :
> > While the current code works correctly, replace the unbounded sprintf()
> > with the safer snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup() to follow secure coding
> > best practices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> > ---
> >   arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> > index eb55dabb4748..077c03cd93e4 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c
> > @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int fsl_rio_setup(struct platform_device *dev)
> >   				kfree(port);
> >   				continue;
> >   		}
> > -		sprintf(port->name, "RIO mport %d", i);
> > +		snprintf(port->name, sizeof(port->name), "RIO mport %d", i);
> 
> Are you sure it is correct ?
> 
> Shouldn't it be sizeof(port->name) - 1 ?

snprintf() takes the destination buffer size (including the NUL) as its
second argument, so sizeof(port->name) should be correct.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-14 14:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-30 14:49 [PATCH] powerpc: fsl_rio: Use snprintf() in fsl_rio_setup() Thorsten Blum
2026-08-14 12:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-08-14 14:46   ` Thorsten Blum

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox