From: yuanjiey <yuanjie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add HAMOA-IOT-COME board
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:55:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anBJic0f2SPRi6RR@YUANJIEY2.ap.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe9d0f2b-3a86-4950-ae4e-fa5182706a38@kernel.org>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 08:36:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/08/2026 08:14, yuanjiey wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 30/07/2026 12:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 30/07/2026 11:54, yuanjiey wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 08:51:40AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 03:07:16PM +0800, Yuanjie Yang wrote:
> >>>>>> Document the device tree binding for the HAMOA-IOT-COME board based on
> >>>>>> the Qualcomm X1E80100 SoC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The platform consists of a system-on-module (SoM) mounted on a carrier
> >>>>>> board. The SoM integrates the core system functionality, including a
> >>>>>> SiP containing the X1E80100 SoC and its supporting components.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The COME SiP hardware is effectively the same as the SoM used on the
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Effectively the same or the same? I googled for "hamoa iot come" and it
> >>>>> gives me zero results. Provide some URLs describing both.
> >>>> The same.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is pdf about the "hamoa iot come" SiP and SoM
> >>>> link: https://advdownload.advantech.com.cn/productfile/PIS/SOM-6820/file/SOM-6820_DS(052925)20250529110758.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>> The preliminary figure provides a complete overview of architecture, including the SiP, SoM.
> >>>>
> >>>> In Block Diagram
> >>>> hamoa come Qualcomm X-Elite SiP Module is the SoM on haoma evk.
> >>>
> >>> I see on that PDF "SOM-6820", not "Hamoa IoT Come".
> >>>
> >>> I have an impression that all this and previous bindings and DTs did not
> >>> match reality at all. Or did not match how upstream works with such
> >>> hardware.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Adding more: I did ask in the past to properly represent SoM and
> >> carriers. I pointed to other examples how this is done correctly. I did
> >> look now inside and found absolutely no reference of actual product
> >> called "Hamoa IoT" or "Purwa IoT". For sure there is no "Hamoa IoT Come"
> >> SoM (sometimes COMe appears).
> >
> > I check the hamoa iot evk board page:
> > https://docs.qualcomm.com/doc/80-77183-262/topic/Getting-started.html#get-familiar
> > and
>
> It says it has "IQ-X7xxx module".
>
> > purwa iot evk board page:
> > https://docs.qualcomm.com/doc/80-80022-297/80-80022-297_REV_AC_Qualcomm_IQ-X_Series_Evaluation_Kit_-_Linux_Bringup_guide.pdf
>
> And this is "IQ-X5xxx"
>
> So how is this anyhow related to Hamoa IoT or Hamoa Iot Come?
Our current naming does not clearly reflect the specific hardware document it refers to.
Maybe "IQ-X7181 evk module" and "IQ-X5121 evk module" can would better reflect the actual
hardware configuration.
just like:
hamoa-iot-som.dtsi --> iq-x7181-evk-som.dtsi
purwa-iot-som.dtsi --> iq-x5121-evk-som.dtsi
IQ-X7181 evk board:
do some dts name fix, just like:
hamoa-iq-x7181-evk.dts
iq-x7181-evk-som.dtsi
hamoa.dtsi
>
> >
> > And I see below info:
> >
> > Dragonwing IQ-X7xxx EVK components:
> > The kit includes the following components:
> > Dragonwing IQ-X7xxx EVK mainboard
> > "System in package (SiP) "
> >
> > I think the current naming of hamoa-iot-som.dtsi and purwa-iot-som.dtsi in the
> > Linux device tree is incorrect. They should be renamed to hamoa-iot-sip.dtsi
> > and purwa-iot-sip.dtsi.
>
> som/sip does not matter here. That's not what we discuss.
>
>
> >
> > hamoa-iot-som.dtsi --> hamoa-iot-sip.dtsi
> > purwa-iot-som.dtsi --> purwa-iot-sip.dtsi
> >
> >> Look, this is a SoM:
> >> https://www.toradex.com/computer-on-modules/verdin-arm-family/nxp-imx95
> >>
> >> And you can find corresponding bindings and DTS in tree.
> >>
> >> I refuse to accept more of this fake products trying to imitate well
> >> known industry standards in their own way and effectively pushing some
> >> downstream crap, just because that's how we do it in downstream.
> >>
> >> Unless you can present us with such product details matching what you
> >> send, I will be NAK-ing these and future patches like that.
> >
> > Thanks for your tips:
> >
> > I check hamoa come som page:
> > https://advdownload.advantech.com.cn/productfile/PIS/SOM-6820/file/SOM-6820_DS(052925)20250529110758.pdf
> > and come board page:
> > https://www.advantech.com.cn/zh-cn/products/1-fc23ff/som-db5830/mod_16b1a718-27d6-4a4c-8684-e8f2a8e9c57b
> >
> > So I should rename come binding with real devices name:
> > binding should be:
> >
> > - items:
> > - enum:
> > - hamoa-som6820-db5830.dts
> > - const: hamoa-som6820.dtsi
>
> No clue what is this. But the links above are Advantech.
correct here:
- items:
- enum:
- advantech,som-db5830
- const: advantech,som-6820
- const: qcom,iq-x7181-evk-som
- const: qcom,x1e80100
Thanks,
Yuanjie
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 7:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] Initial support for Qualcomm Hamoa IOT COME board Yuanjie Yang
2026-07-27 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add HAMOA-IOT-COME board Yuanjie Yang
2026-07-30 6:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-30 9:54 ` yuanjiey
2026-07-30 10:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-30 10:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-03 6:14 ` yuanjiey
2026-08-03 6:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-03 7:55 ` yuanjiey [this message]
2026-07-27 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base " Yuanjie Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anBJic0f2SPRi6RR@YUANJIEY2.ap.qualcomm.com \
--to=yuanjie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox