The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
	Ankit Soni <ankit.soni@amd.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu/amd: Fix DTE clearing and rename iommu_ignore_device()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 17:29:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao3RF0w_AXo5EXxv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825114916.GT244917@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 08:49:16AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 10:32:07AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 03:13:21PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > [ ... 52 lines skipped ... ]
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Invalidate a DTE by clearing the Valid bit first.
> > > > + * Note: Lockless; Not to be used on a fully probed
> > > > + * device with live dev_data.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void amd_iommu_disable_dte(struct dev_table_entry *ptr)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct dev_table_entry new = {};
> > > > +
> > > > +	write_dte_lower128(ptr, &new);
> > > > +	write_dte_upper128(ptr, &new);
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > No need just call update_dte256() with a 0'd new. This is how all the
> > > update flows work, and it flushes the DTE which this looks like it has
> > > been missing all long.
> > 
> > I originally considered using update_dte256(), but iommu_disable_device
> > is called from the early probe error path (err_deinit).
> 
> There is no reason to do that, the DTE isn't written by
> amd_iommu_probe_device(), so there is no reason to clear it on an
> error path.
> 
> It is wrong to write to the DTE table without flushing the
> HW cache.
> 

I agree, but I wonder why the existing code used memset here 
(in ignore_device):

memset(&dev_table[devid], 0, sizeof(struct dev_table_entry));

I was thinking it might've been done for probe failures in a kdump
kernel (normal kexec would've called shutdown for clearing all DTEs).
(I see this was added long time back and existed when PCI segments were
added [1]).

Are you suggesting to remove the DTE clearing from this path entirely?

Thanks,
Praan

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220706113825.25582-23-vasant.hegde@amd.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 12:23 [PATCH v3 0/5] iommu/amd: Refactors for ATS robustness Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu/amd: Refactor device probe and capability initialization Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 18:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25 10:24     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-25 11:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25  6:59   ` Vasant Hegde
2026-08-25 10:25     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu/amd: Fix DTE clearing and rename iommu_ignore_device() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 18:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25 10:32     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-25 11:49       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25 17:29         ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-08-25 17:53           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25 19:08             ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 21:47   ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-25  7:01   ` Vasant Hegde
2026-08-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 18:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25 10:34     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu/amd: Fail probe on ATS configuration failure Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 18:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-24 21:46   ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-08-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] PCI/ATS: Mandate checking pci_ats_supported() before pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-24 18:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-24 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] iommu/amd: Refactors for ATS robustness Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25 10:39   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-25 11:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-25  7:06 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-08-25 10:37   ` Pranjal Shrivastava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ao3RF0w_AXo5EXxv@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=ankit.soni@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox