The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] s390/cpacf: Unpoison instruction results
@ 2026-08-07 12:20 Ilya Leoshkevich
  2026-08-13 14:06 ` Harald Freudenberger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Leoshkevich @ 2026-08-07 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Harald Freudenberger, Holger Dengler, Heiko Carstens,
	Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev
  Cc: linux-s390, linux-kernel, Ilya Leoshkevich

Stop KMSAN from complaining about CPACF outputs being uninitialized.

Do not unpoison variable-length parameter blocks: mapping function
codes (like CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256) to lengths is ugly. Let the callers
handle this once need arises.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20260806190223.3292580-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2: Unpoison outputs of more instructions (Sashiko).

 arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
index a83683169d98d..13d6a6344802a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static __always_inline void __cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode,
 					  cpacf_mask_t *mask)
 {
 	__cpacf_query_insn(opcode, mask, CPACF_FC_QUERY);
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(mask, sizeof(*mask));
 }
 
 static __always_inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode)
@@ -370,6 +371,7 @@ static __always_inline int cpacf_query_func(unsigned int opcode,
 static __always_inline void __cpacf_qai(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_qai_t *qai)
 {
 	__cpacf_query_insn(opcode, qai, CPACF_FC_QUERY_AUTH_INFO);
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(qai, sizeof(*qai));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -422,6 +424,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_km(unsigned long func, void *param,
 		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KM)
 		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
 
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
 	return src_len - s.odd;
 }
 
@@ -454,6 +457,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmc(unsigned long func, void *param,
 		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMC)
 		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
 
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
 	return src_len - s.odd;
 }
 
@@ -587,6 +591,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmctr(unsigned long func, void *param, u8 *dest,
 		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMCTR)
 		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
 
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
 	return src_len - s.odd;
 }
 
@@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_prno(unsigned long func, void *param,
 		: [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
 		  [seed] "d" (s.pair), [opc] "i" (CPACF_PRNO)
 		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, dest_len);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -731,6 +737,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_kma(unsigned long func, void *param, u8 *dest,
 		: [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
 		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMA)
 		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len);
 }
 
 #endif	/* _ASM_S390_CPACF_H */
-- 
2.55.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] s390/cpacf: Unpoison instruction results
  2026-08-07 12:20 [PATCH v2] s390/cpacf: Unpoison instruction results Ilya Leoshkevich
@ 2026-08-13 14:06 ` Harald Freudenberger
  2026-08-13 14:09   ` Ilya Leoshkevich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Harald Freudenberger @ 2026-08-13 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilya Leoshkevich
  Cc: Holger Dengler, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev,
	linux-s390, linux-kernel

On 2026-08-07 14:20, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Stop KMSAN from complaining about CPACF outputs being uninitialized.
> 
> Do not unpoison variable-length parameter blocks: mapping function
> codes (like CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256) to lengths is ugly. Let the callers
> handle this once need arises.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20260806190223.3292580-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
> v1 -> v2: Unpoison outputs of more instructions (Sashiko).
> 

See my comment below.

>  arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h 
> b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
> index a83683169d98d..13d6a6344802a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static __always_inline void __cpacf_query(unsigned
> int opcode,
>  					  cpacf_mask_t *mask)
>  {
>  	__cpacf_query_insn(opcode, mask, CPACF_FC_QUERY);
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(mask, sizeof(*mask));
>  }
> 
>  static __always_inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode)
> @@ -370,6 +371,7 @@ static __always_inline int
> cpacf_query_func(unsigned int opcode,
>  static __always_inline void __cpacf_qai(unsigned int opcode, 
> cpacf_qai_t *qai)
>  {
>  	__cpacf_query_insn(opcode, qai, CPACF_FC_QUERY_AUTH_INFO);
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(qai, sizeof(*qai));
>  }
> 
>  /**
> @@ -422,6 +424,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_km(unsigned long func, void 
> *param,
>  		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KM)
>  		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
> 
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>  	return src_len - s.odd;
>  }
> 
> @@ -454,6 +457,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmc(unsigned long func, 
> void *param,
>  		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMC)
>  		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
> 
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>  	return src_len - s.odd;
>  }
> 
> @@ -587,6 +591,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmctr(unsigned long func,
> void *param, u8 *dest,
>  		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMCTR)
>  		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
> 
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>  	return src_len - s.odd;
>  }
> 
> @@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_prno(unsigned long func,
> void *param,
>  		: [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
>  		  [seed] "d" (s.pair), [opc] "i" (CPACF_PRNO)
>  		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, dest_len);
>  }
> 
>  /**
> @@ -731,6 +737,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_kma(unsigned long func,
> void *param, u8 *dest,
>  		: [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
>  		  [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMA)
>  		: "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
> +	kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len);

I am unhappy with this kma thing. This would only work properly with
CC 0. But CC 1 and 2 are not handled properly. However, I had a closer
look onto the AR for kma and ... well this inline function should
handle CC 1 and CC 2 somehow and it should similar to the other inline
functions return the number of bytes processed like for example 
cpacf_km().
I'll open up a bugzilla to fix this kma inline function.
If you leave out this kma hunk you can add my R-b.

>  }
> 
>  #endif	/* _ASM_S390_CPACF_H */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] s390/cpacf: Unpoison instruction results
  2026-08-13 14:06 ` Harald Freudenberger
@ 2026-08-13 14:09   ` Ilya Leoshkevich
  2026-08-13 15:51     ` Harald Freudenberger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Leoshkevich @ 2026-08-13 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: freude
  Cc: Holger Dengler, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev,
	linux-s390, linux-kernel



On 8/13/26 16:06, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> On 2026-08-07 14:20, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> Stop KMSAN from complaining about CPACF outputs being uninitialized.
>>
>> Do not unpoison variable-length parameter blocks: mapping function
>> codes (like CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256) to lengths is ugly. Let the callers
>> handle this once need arises.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20260806190223.3292580-1- 
>> iii@linux.ibm.com/
>> v1 -> v2: Unpoison outputs of more instructions (Sashiko).
>>
> 
> See my comment below.
> 
>>  arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ 
>> cpacf.h
>> index a83683169d98d..13d6a6344802a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
>> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static __always_inline void __cpacf_query(unsigned
>> int opcode,
>>                        cpacf_mask_t *mask)
>>  {
>>      __cpacf_query_insn(opcode, mask, CPACF_FC_QUERY);
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(mask, sizeof(*mask));
>>  }
>>
>>  static __always_inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode)
>> @@ -370,6 +371,7 @@ static __always_inline int
>> cpacf_query_func(unsigned int opcode,
>>  static __always_inline void __cpacf_qai(unsigned int opcode, 
>> cpacf_qai_t *qai)
>>  {
>>      __cpacf_query_insn(opcode, qai, CPACF_FC_QUERY_AUTH_INFO);
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(qai, sizeof(*qai));
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> @@ -422,6 +424,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_km(unsigned long func, 
>> void *param,
>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KM)
>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>>      return src_len - s.odd;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -454,6 +457,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmc(unsigned long func, 
>> void *param,
>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMC)
>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>>      return src_len - s.odd;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -587,6 +591,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmctr(unsigned long func,
>> void *param, u8 *dest,
>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMCTR)
>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>>      return src_len - s.odd;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_prno(unsigned long func,
>> void *param,
>>          : [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
>>            [seed] "d" (s.pair), [opc] "i" (CPACF_PRNO)
>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, dest_len);
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> @@ -731,6 +737,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_kma(unsigned long func,
>> void *param, u8 *dest,
>>          : [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMA)
>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len);
> 
> I am unhappy with this kma thing. This would only work properly with
> CC 0. But CC 1 and 2 are not handled properly. However, I had a closer
> look onto the AR for kma and ... well this inline function should
> handle CC 1 and CC 2 somehow and it should similar to the other inline
> functions return the number of bytes processed like for example cpacf_km().
> I'll open up a bugzilla to fix this kma inline function.
> If you leave out this kma hunk you can add my R-b.

Will do, thanks!

May I ask you to add a proper KMSAN annotation while fixing CC1/CC2
cases? Alternatively I can do it myself afterwards, of course.

> 
>>  }
>>
>>  #endif    /* _ASM_S390_CPACF_H */


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] s390/cpacf: Unpoison instruction results
  2026-08-13 14:09   ` Ilya Leoshkevich
@ 2026-08-13 15:51     ` Harald Freudenberger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Harald Freudenberger @ 2026-08-13 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilya Leoshkevich
  Cc: Holger Dengler, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev,
	linux-s390, linux-kernel

On 2026-08-13 16:09, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On 8/13/26 16:06, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>> On 2026-08-07 14:20, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>>> Stop KMSAN from complaining about CPACF outputs being uninitialized.
>>> 
>>> Do not unpoison variable-length parameter blocks: mapping function
>>> codes (like CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256) to lengths is ugly. Let the callers
>>> handle this once need arises.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20260806190223.3292580-1- 
>>> iii@linux.ibm.com/
>>> v1 -> v2: Unpoison outputs of more instructions (Sashiko).
>>> 
>> 
>> See my comment below.
>> 
>>>  arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 7 +++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ 
>>> cpacf.h
>>> index a83683169d98d..13d6a6344802a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
>>> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static __always_inline void 
>>> __cpacf_query(unsigned
>>> int opcode,
>>>                        cpacf_mask_t *mask)
>>>  {
>>>      __cpacf_query_insn(opcode, mask, CPACF_FC_QUERY);
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(mask, sizeof(*mask));
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  static __always_inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode)
>>> @@ -370,6 +371,7 @@ static __always_inline int
>>> cpacf_query_func(unsigned int opcode,
>>>  static __always_inline void __cpacf_qai(unsigned int opcode, 
>>> cpacf_qai_t *qai)
>>>  {
>>>      __cpacf_query_insn(opcode, qai, CPACF_FC_QUERY_AUTH_INFO);
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(qai, sizeof(*qai));
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  /**
>>> @@ -422,6 +424,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_km(unsigned long func, 
>>> void *param,
>>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KM)
>>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>> 
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>>>      return src_len - s.odd;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> @@ -454,6 +457,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmc(unsigned long func, 
>>> void *param,
>>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMC)
>>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>> 
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>>>      return src_len - s.odd;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> @@ -587,6 +591,7 @@ static inline int cpacf_kmctr(unsigned long func,
>>> void *param, u8 *dest,
>>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMCTR)
>>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>> 
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len - s.odd);
>>>      return src_len - s.odd;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> @@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_prno(unsigned long func,
>>> void *param,
>>>          : [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
>>>            [seed] "d" (s.pair), [opc] "i" (CPACF_PRNO)
>>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, dest_len);
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  /**
>>> @@ -731,6 +737,7 @@ static inline void cpacf_kma(unsigned long func,
>>> void *param, u8 *dest,
>>>          : [fc] "d" (func), [pba] "d" ((unsigned long)param),
>>>            [opc] "i" (CPACF_KMA)
>>>          : "cc", "memory", "0", "1");
>>> +    kmsan_unpoison_memory(dest, src_len);
>> 
>> I am unhappy with this kma thing. This would only work properly with
>> CC 0. But CC 1 and 2 are not handled properly. However, I had a closer
>> look onto the AR for kma and ... well this inline function should
>> handle CC 1 and CC 2 somehow and it should similar to the other inline
>> functions return the number of bytes processed like for example 
>> cpacf_km().
>> I'll open up a bugzilla to fix this kma inline function.
>> If you leave out this kma hunk you can add my R-b.
> 
> Will do, thanks!
> 
> May I ask you to add a proper KMSAN annotation while fixing CC1/CC2
> cases? Alternatively I can do it myself afterwards, of course.
> 

Yes, I'll do that.

>> 
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  #endif    /* _ASM_S390_CPACF_H */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-13 15:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-07 12:20 [PATCH v2] s390/cpacf: Unpoison instruction results Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-08-13 14:06 ` Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-13 14:09   ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-08-13 15:51     ` Harald Freudenberger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox