The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BUG?] Signedness of __kernel_nlink_t on Sparc?
@ 2005-03-14  0:21 Kyle Moffett
  2005-03-14  1:56 ` David S. Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Moffett @ 2005-03-14  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Sparc Linux Mailing List, William Lee Irwin

In include/asm-sparc/types.h, __kernel_nlink_t is signed, whereas on 
all the
other architectures it is unsigned.  Is this intentional, or a bug?

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r  
!y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-14  1:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-14  0:21 [BUG?] Signedness of __kernel_nlink_t on Sparc? Kyle Moffett
2005-03-14  1:56 ` David S. Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox