Re: [v2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix memory leak in amd_pmf_get_pb_data()

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 1/28/24 11:45, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Thank you for your patch/series, I've applied this patch
>> (series) to my review-hans branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>>
>> Note it will show up in the pdx86 review-hans branch once I've
>> pushed my local branch there, which might take a while.
> 
> Will development interests grow for the application of known scripts
> also according to the semantic patch language?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?h=v6.8-rc1#n71

Markus,

I'm not sure what your question here is?

Is it: "Will coccinelle scripts be run as part of the regular patch
test/merge workflow?" then the answer is that there are no plans
that I'm aware of to do that at this moment.

If such a thing were to be done, IMHO it would be best to have one
of the existing CI systems like e.h. Intel's LKP test bot run this
on linux-next, or on all the trees LKP already monitors.

And it does sound like something interesting to do, but someone
would need to actually setup and maintain such a CI system.

If the question is: "Are patches generated by coccinelle welcome?"
then the answer is "Yes patches generated by coccinelle are very
much welcome".

Regards,

Hans