From: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: felixb@sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:34:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bzy7hybzh6k.fsf@fransum.emea.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.64.0907131209250.6808@ask.diku.dk
Julia Lawall writes:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> The result of container_of should not be NULL. In particular, in this case
> the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_DELAYED_WORK,
> which dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
Given the defn of container_of() it seems clear that neither its input
pointer nor its result should ever be NULL.
In this particular case, there is a check for NULL and early exit in
xfs_mru_cache_create(), the function that does the INIT_DELAYED_WORK().
Olaf
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression x,e;
> @@
> x = container_of(...)
> ... when != x = e
> * x == NULL
> // </smpl>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-By: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
> index 4b0613d..0651ce7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
> @@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ _xfs_mru_cache_reap(
> xfs_mru_cache_t *mru = container_of(work, xfs_mru_cache_t, work.work);
> unsigned long now, next;
> - ASSERT(mru && mru->lists);
> - if (!mru || !mru->lists)
> + ASSERT(mru->lists);
> + if (!mru->lists)
> return;
> spin_lock(&mru->lock);
--
Olaf Weber SGI Phone: +31(0)30-6696752
Veldzigt 2b Fax: +31(0)30-6696799
Technical Lead 3454 PW de Meern Vnet: 955-7151
Storage Software The Netherlands Email: olaf@sgi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-14 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-13 10:10 [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test Julia Lawall
2009-07-14 10:34 ` Olaf Weber [this message]
2009-07-14 12:15 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bzy7hybzh6k.fsf@fransum.emea.sgi.com \
--to=olaf@sgi.com \
--cc=felixb@sgi.com \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox