* [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test
@ 2009-07-13 10:10 Julia Lawall
2009-07-14 10:34 ` Olaf Weber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2009-07-13 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: felixb, xfs-masters, xfs, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The result of container_of should not be NULL. In particular, in this case
the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_DELAYED_WORK,
which dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x,e;
@@
x = container_of(...)
... when != x = e
* x == NULL
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
index 4b0613d..0651ce7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ _xfs_mru_cache_reap(
xfs_mru_cache_t *mru = container_of(work, xfs_mru_cache_t, work.work);
unsigned long now, next;
- ASSERT(mru && mru->lists);
- if (!mru || !mru->lists)
+ ASSERT(mru->lists);
+ if (!mru->lists)
return;
spin_lock(&mru->lock);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test
2009-07-13 10:10 [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test Julia Lawall
@ 2009-07-14 10:34 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-14 12:15 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Olaf Weber @ 2009-07-14 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: felixb, xfs-masters, xfs, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Julia Lawall writes:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> The result of container_of should not be NULL. In particular, in this case
> the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_DELAYED_WORK,
> which dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
Given the defn of container_of() it seems clear that neither its input
pointer nor its result should ever be NULL.
In this particular case, there is a check for NULL and early exit in
xfs_mru_cache_create(), the function that does the INIT_DELAYED_WORK().
Olaf
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression x,e;
> @@
> x = container_of(...)
> ... when != x = e
> * x == NULL
> // </smpl>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-By: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
> index 4b0613d..0651ce7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mru_cache.c
> @@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ _xfs_mru_cache_reap(
> xfs_mru_cache_t *mru = container_of(work, xfs_mru_cache_t, work.work);
> unsigned long now, next;
> - ASSERT(mru && mru->lists);
> - if (!mru || !mru->lists)
> + ASSERT(mru->lists);
> + if (!mru->lists)
> return;
> spin_lock(&mru->lock);
--
Olaf Weber SGI Phone: +31(0)30-6696752
Veldzigt 2b Fax: +31(0)30-6696799
Technical Lead 3454 PW de Meern Vnet: 955-7151
Storage Software The Netherlands Email: olaf@sgi.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test
2009-07-14 10:34 ` Olaf Weber
@ 2009-07-14 12:15 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2009-07-14 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olaf Weber; +Cc: felixb, xfs-masters, xfs, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Olaf Weber wrote:
> Julia Lawall writes:
>
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> > The result of container_of should not be NULL. In particular, in this case
> > the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_DELAYED_WORK,
> > which dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
>
> Given the defn of container_of() it seems clear that neither its input
> pointer nor its result should ever be NULL.
container_of just does pointer arithmetic. The result of that arithmetic
can be NULL, ie if the argument was obtained from an expression of the
form &x->f where x was NULL. But in principle, values should be checked
for NULL beforehand.
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-14 12:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-13 10:10 [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test Julia Lawall
2009-07-14 10:34 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-14 12:15 ` Julia Lawall
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox