Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: media: qcom,sm8550-iris: update power domain name

[Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com>]

On 3/12/2025 2:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2025 18:47, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>
>> On 3/11/2025 11:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2025 13:03, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>> Not all platforms has a collapsible mx, so use the more generic naming
>>>> of mx in the binding.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, neither tested, nor justified. Read the file. How many platforms do
>>> you have there? One. Out of this one platform you claim not all of them
>>> have MX collapsible, so you want MX?
>> Let say we have one which is non-collapsible, what should be the way in that
>> case to use the bindings which differ only in the MX/MXC part ?
> 
> 
> I don't care about imaginary things. Send patches for real hardware. How
> does collapsibility of the domain change the real hardware interface?
It does not. I am now thinking to drop this patch altogether, and continue to
use MXC as defined in bindings, irrespective of connection to hardware as MX or
MXC. For ex SM8550/SA8775P have MXC, while QCS8300 have MX, but again, as you
mentioned, these difference just alters some property in DT, binding can remain
same.
Regards,
Vikash