From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)" <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>, Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>,
Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pascal EBERHARD" <pascal.eberhard@se.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix DDR50 mode for cards without tuning support
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 11:16:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c75cb7be-b3e1-4efb-a04d-6d705ffe7245@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803-am654-sdhci-v2-0-a5ee5be86133@bootlin.com>
On 03/08/2026 16:47, Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric) wrote:
> DDR50 mode is not required to support the tuning command CMD19 by the
> eMMC/SD specification, meaning that calibration may fail on cards that
> do not implement it. This series fixes four issues discovered when
> using such cards:
>
> - Patch 1 moves the tuning_loop counter from a persistent struct field
> to a local variable, preventing failed tuning attempts from depleting
> the retry budget across calls.
>
> - Patch 2 ensures the command/data line reset is always performed
> after tuning, even on failure, preventing stale data in the
> controller buffer.
>
> - Patch 3 clears the ITAPDLY enable and delay values on tuning
> failure so that leftover calibration values do not interfere with
> subsequent I/O.
>
> - Patch 4 falls back to the DT-provided itap delay value for DDR50
> when tuning fails in this mode, making a best-effort attempt at a
> known-good delay being programmed.
>
> Together these changes make DDR50 functional on TI J721E SoCs with
> cards that lack CMD19 tuning support. This second version addresses
> all comments from Sashiko, which I found to be correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric) <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>
For all 4:
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add new patch moving tuning_loop to a local variable (Patch 1)
> - Clear ITAPDLY array values alongside HW registers on tuning failure (Patch 3)
> - Save DT-provided itap delay values for DDR50 in dedicated variables
> to preserve them across tuning cycles (Patch 4)
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260729-am654-sdhci-v1-0-7568108e4b9a@bootlin.com
>
> ---
> Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric) (4):
> mmc: sdhci_am654: Move tuning_loop to local variable
> mmc: sdhci_am654: Reset command and data lines on failed tuning
> mmc: sdhci_am654: Clear ITAPDLY on tuning failure
> mmc: sdhci_am654: Fallback to DT-provided itap delay on DDR50 tuning failure
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: f932188d6b0b684ee8555c8ecf1cac3567c4b106
> change-id: 20260728-am654-sdhci-85094d458bae
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 13:47 [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix DDR50 mode for cards without tuning support Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Move tuning_loop to local variable Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:19 ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Reset command and data lines on failed tuning Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:28 ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Clear ITAPDLY on tuning failure Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:40 ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fallback to DT-provided itap delay on DDR50 " Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:59 ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-04 8:45 ` Diogo Ivo
2026-08-05 23:13 ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-07 6:35 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 10:52 ` Diogo Ivo
2026-08-07 8:16 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c75cb7be-b3e1-4efb-a04d-6d705ffe7245@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=diogo.ivo@bootlin.com \
--cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
--cc=jm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=pascal.eberhard@se.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox