Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/super.c: introduce get_tree_bdev_by_dev()

[Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>]

On 2024/10/8 20:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:10:45PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> But the error message out of get_tree_bdev() is inflexible and
>> IMHO it's too coupled to `fc->source`.
>>
>>> Otherwise just passing a quiet flag of some form feels like a much
>>> saner interface.
>>
>> I'm fine with this way, but that will be a treewide change, I
>> will send out a version with a flag later.
> 
> I'd probably just add a get_tree_bdev_flags and pass 0 flags from
> get_tree_bdev.

how about
int get_tree_bdev_flags(struct fs_context *fc,
		int (*fill_super)(struct super_block *,
				  struct fs_context *), bool quiet)

for now? it can be turned into `int flags` if other needs
are shown later (and I don't need to define an enum.)

Does it look good to you? if okay, I will follow this way.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang