From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
babu.moger@amd.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
newtonl@nvidia.com, kristinc@nvidia.com, kaihengf@nvidia.com,
kobak@nvidia.com, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/resctrl: Skip L3_CAT when no exclusive cache portion exists
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:03:52 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <caa75960-6f21-3ae8-cb29-d5b08d89e74b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528102956.33121-2-icheng@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2422 bytes --]
On Thu, 28 May 2026, Richard Cheng wrote:
> L3_CAT measures cache isolation, which requires at least one cache bit
> that is not shared with non-CPU agents, i.e. cbm_mask & ~shareable_bits
> must be non-zero. On MPAM, shareable_bits == cbm_mask is a legitimate
> state, so there are situations in which no bit can be reported as
> exclusive.
>
> Previously get_mask_no_shareable() was invoked inside cat_run_test()
> and silently returned -1, which surfaced as a test failure on arm64
> MPAM systems.
>
> Implement cat_feature_check() to perform the same check at feature-check
> time. It prints a diagnostic and returns false so the test case is
> skipped instead of failing.
>
> Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index f00b622c1460..dc414e55ae94 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -378,11 +378,32 @@ static bool noncont_cat_feature_check(const struct resctrl_test *test)
> return resource_info_file_exists(test->resource, "sparse_masks");
> }
>
> +static bool cat_feature_check(const struct resctrl_test *test)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask;
> +
> + if (!test_resource_feature_check(test))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * The CAT isolation measurement needs a cache portion that no
> + * other agent shares. On MPAM the kernel may legitimately report
> + * all bits as shareable; skip the test if that is the case.
> + */
> + if (get_mask_no_shareable(test->resource, &mask)) {
> + ksft_print_msg("All %s bits are shareable; cannot measure CAT isolation\n",
> + test->resource);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> struct resctrl_test l3_cat_test = {
> .name = "L3_CAT",
> .group = "CAT",
> .resource = "L3",
> - .feature_check = test_resource_feature_check,
> + .feature_check = cat_feature_check,
> .run_test = cat_run_test,
> .cleanup = cat_test_cleanup,
> };
>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Nit, the patch numbering and the numbering used in the coverletter did not
match.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 10:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] selftests/resctrl: Fix resctrl selftests issues on aarch64 Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/resctrl: Skip L3_CAT when no exclusive cache portion exists Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 11:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-05-28 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/resctrl: Implement cl_flush() and sb() for aarch64 Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/resctrl: Recognise aarch64 as a vendor for L3_NONCONT_CAT Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 11:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=caa75960-6f21-3ae8-cb29-d5b08d89e74b@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox