The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	 shuah@kernel.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	 babu.moger@amd.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
	newtonl@nvidia.com,  kristinc@nvidia.com, kaihengf@nvidia.com,
	kobak@nvidia.com,  Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/resctrl: Skip L3_CAT when no exclusive cache portion exists
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:03:52 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <caa75960-6f21-3ae8-cb29-d5b08d89e74b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528102956.33121-2-icheng@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2422 bytes --]

On Thu, 28 May 2026, Richard Cheng wrote:

> L3_CAT measures cache isolation, which requires at least one cache bit
> that is not shared with non-CPU agents, i.e. cbm_mask & ~shareable_bits
> must be non-zero. On MPAM, shareable_bits == cbm_mask is a legitimate
> state, so there are situations in which no bit can be reported as
> exclusive.
> 
> Previously get_mask_no_shareable() was invoked inside cat_run_test()
> and silently returned -1, which surfaced as a test failure on arm64
> MPAM systems.
> 
> Implement cat_feature_check() to perform the same check at feature-check
> time. It prints a diagnostic and returns false so the test case is
> skipped instead of failing.
> 
> Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index f00b622c1460..dc414e55ae94 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -378,11 +378,32 @@ static bool noncont_cat_feature_check(const struct resctrl_test *test)
>  	return resource_info_file_exists(test->resource, "sparse_masks");
>  }
>  
> +static bool cat_feature_check(const struct resctrl_test *test)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mask;
> +
> +	if (!test_resource_feature_check(test))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The CAT isolation measurement needs a cache portion that no
> +	 * other agent shares. On MPAM the kernel may legitimately report
> +	 * all bits as shareable; skip the test if that is the case.
> +	 */
> +	if (get_mask_no_shareable(test->resource, &mask)) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("All %s bits are shareable; cannot measure CAT isolation\n",
> +			       test->resource);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  struct resctrl_test l3_cat_test = {
>  	.name = "L3_CAT",
>  	.group = "CAT",
>  	.resource = "L3",
> -	.feature_check = test_resource_feature_check,
> +	.feature_check = cat_feature_check,
>  	.run_test = cat_run_test,
>  	.cleanup = cat_test_cleanup,
>  };
> 

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>

Nit, the patch numbering and the numbering used in the coverletter did not 
match.

-- 
 i.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28 10:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] selftests/resctrl: Fix resctrl selftests issues on aarch64 Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/resctrl: Skip L3_CAT when no exclusive cache portion exists Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 11:03   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-05-28 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/resctrl: Implement cl_flush() and sb() for aarch64 Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/resctrl: Recognise aarch64 as a vendor for L3_NONCONT_CAT Richard Cheng
2026-05-28 11:01   ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=caa75960-6f21-3ae8-cb29-d5b08d89e74b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox