* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-04-11 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-11 14:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-11 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-04-11 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, elfring
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 780 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> batman-adv: Improve exception handling in batadv_throw_uevent()
>
> Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> batman-adv: Return directly after a failed batadv_dat_select_candidates() in batadv_dat_forward_data()
>
Questionable cleanups, untested, do not fix any bug, please drop.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-04-11 14:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-12 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-04-11 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: elfring, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:59:08PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> > Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > batman-adv: Improve exception handling in batadv_throw_uevent()
> >
> > Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > batman-adv: Return directly after a failed batadv_dat_select_candidates() in batadv_dat_forward_data()
> >
>
> Questionable cleanups, untested, do not fix any bug, please drop.
good point, now dropped.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 14:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-04-12 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-04-12 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: elfring, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 879 bytes --]
Hi!
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> > > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> >
> > > Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > batman-adv: Improve exception handling in batadv_throw_uevent()
> > >
> > > Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > batman-adv: Return directly after a failed batadv_dat_select_candidates() in batadv_dat_forward_data()
> > >
> >
> > Questionable cleanups, untested, do not fix any bug, please drop.
>
> good point, now dropped.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-11 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-04-11 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-11 17:13 ` SeongJae Park
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-04-11 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 805 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Linux 5.15.155-rc1 (857e7024b96f), 5.4.274-rc1 (82d3ef764065),
6.6.27-rc1 (3126167a036c) and 6.8.6-rc1 (1e41d76814ed) tests are
passing, too.
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-11 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-11 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-04-11 17:13 ` SeongJae Park
2024-04-11 19:29 ` Florian Fainelli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-04-11 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:56:32 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 2cacd493e299 ("Linux 6.1.86-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-11 17:13 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-04-11 19:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-11 23:43 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-04-11 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/11/24 02:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-11 19:29 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-04-11 23:43 ` Shuah Khan
2024-04-12 6:38 ` Shreeya Patel
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-04-11 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 4/11/24 03:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-11 23:43 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-04-12 6:38 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-04-12 7:25 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-04-12 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
Gustavo Padovan, kernelci-regressions mailing list
On Thursday, April 11, 2024 15:26 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
KernelCI report for stable-rc/linux-6.1.y for this week :-
## stable-rc HEAD for linux-6.1.y:
Date: 2024-04-10
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=bf1e3b1cb1e002ed1590c91f1a24433b59322368
## Build failures:
No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
## Boot failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-12 6:38 ` Shreeya Patel
@ 2024-04-12 7:25 ` Ron Economos
2024-04-12 8:04 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-04-12 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/11/24 2:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-12 7:25 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-04-12 8:04 ` Jon Hunter
2024-04-12 15:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-04-12 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:56:32 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
102 tests: 102 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.86-rc1-g2cacd493e299
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-12 8:04 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-04-12 15:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-04-12 20:15 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-04-12 22:23 ` Kelsey Steele
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-04-12 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 16:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.86-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 2cacd493e299f82c489b78ba1de45da451d02bb0
* git describe: v6.1.85-84-g2cacd493e299
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.85-84-g2cacd493e299
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.85)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.85)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.85)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.85)
## Test result summary
total: 161977, pass: 138152, fail: 2686, skip: 20976, xfail: 163
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 139 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 36 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-12 15:14 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-04-12 20:15 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-04-12 22:23 ` Kelsey Steele
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mateusz Jończyk @ 2024-04-12 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
W dniu 11.04.2024 o 11:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman pisze:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Hello,
Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU and Ubuntu 20.04.
Stack:
- amd64,
- ext4 on top of LVM on top of LUKS on top of mdraid on top of
NVMe and SATA drives (the SATA drive in the write-mostly mode).
Tested (lightly):
- suspend to RAM,
- suspend to disk,
- virtual machines in QEMU (both i386 and amd64 guests),
- GPU (Intel HD Graphics 620, with 2 Unigine benchmarks)
- WiFi (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- Bluetooth (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- PCI soundcard (Intel HD Audio),
- USB soundcard (Logitech Pro X),
- webcam.
Filesystems tested very lightly (mounting, listing and opening files):
- NFS,
- exFAT
- NTFS via FUSE
Issues found: none
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Greetings,
Mateusz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review
2024-04-11 9:56 [PATCH 6.1 00/83] 6.1.86-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-12 20:15 ` Mateusz Jończyk
@ 2024-04-12 22:23 ` Kelsey Steele
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-04-12 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.86 release.
> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:53:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you. :)
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread