The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar	 <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli	 <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,  Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	 Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	 ricardo.neri@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] sched/fair: Check CPU capacity before comparing group types during load balance
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 12:26:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf2de4073b1297e0589679b45ec7b2e1e364ef22.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514-rneri-fix-cas-clusters-v3-1-0037869554bd@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 2026-05-14 at 11:34 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> update_sd_pick_busiest() may incorrectly select a fully_busy group as the
> busiest group when its per-CPU capacity exceeds that of the destination
> CPU. This happens because the type of busiest group is initialized to
> group_has_spare and allows the fully_busy group to win the type comparison.
> 
> update_sd_pick_busiest() should not choose a candidate scheduling group
> with at most one runnable task if its per-CPU capacity is greater than that
> of the destination CPU. Such a check already exists, but it is done too
> late: after the type comparison, preventing a subsequent fully_busy group
> of equal per-CPU capacity from being correctly selected.
> 
> Move this check to occur before comparing group types.

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

> 
> Fixes: 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
> Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
>  * Added a Fixes tag. (Christian)
>  * Added Reviewed-by tag from Christian. Thanks!
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  * Added a note clarifying that SMT and SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY are mutually
>    exclusive. (Tim)
>  * Kept parentheses around bitwise operators for clarity.
>  * Rewrote patch description for clarity.
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 3ebec186f982..e06e74d9ce0e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10818,6 +10818,20 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
>  	     sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare))
>  		return false;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Candidate sg has no more than one task per CPU and has higher
> +	 * per-CPU capacity. Migrating tasks to less capable CPUs may harm
> +	 * throughput. Maximize throughput, power/energy consequences are not
> +	 * considered.
> +	 *
> +	 * Systems with SMT are unaffected, as asymmetric capacity is not set
> +	 * in such cases.
> +	 */
> +	if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) &&
> +	    (sgs->group_type <= group_fully_busy) &&
> +	    (capacity_greater(sg->sgc->min_capacity, capacity_of(env->dst_cpu))))
> +		return false;
> +
>  	if (sgs->group_type > busiest->group_type)
>  		return true;
>  
> @@ -10920,17 +10934,6 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Candidate sg has no more than one task per CPU and has higher
> -	 * per-CPU capacity. Migrating tasks to less capable CPUs may harm
> -	 * throughput. Maximize throughput, power/energy consequences are not
> -	 * considered.
> -	 */
> -	if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) &&
> -	    (sgs->group_type <= group_fully_busy) &&
> -	    (capacity_greater(sg->sgc->min_capacity, capacity_of(env->dst_cpu))))
> -		return false;
> -
>  	return true;
>  }
>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-14 18:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] sched: Fix cluster scheduling in the presence of asymmetric capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-05-14 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] sched/fair: Check CPU capacity before comparing group types during load balance Ricardo Neri
2026-05-15 12:29   ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-15 19:26   ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-05-14 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] sched/fair: Skip misfit load accounting when the destination CPU cannot help Ricardo Neri
2026-05-15 12:49   ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-15 20:12   ` Tim Chen
2026-05-14 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] sched/fair: Allow load balancing between CPUs of identical capacity Ricardo Neri
2026-05-15 15:16   ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-14 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] sched/topology: Do not clear SD_PREFER_SIBLING in domains with clusters Ricardo Neri
2026-05-15 20:21   ` Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf2de4073b1297e0589679b45ec7b2e1e364ef22.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox