Re: [PATCH v2] perf docs: Mark the Android document as obsolete

[Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>]

On 7/16/24 10:10, James Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 7:34 AM Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> wrote:

[...]

>> I think this is objectively worse than just removing the file. It is
> 
> Objectively worse is a bit strong. There was some discussion on the
> previous version about the reasoning, but the point is to leave keywords
> so that someone re-writing the NDK docs in the future can find it and
> then the history will be preserved rather than putting it in a new file
> with a new name. Or even someone wondering why their build command
> doesn't work has at least something documented about it, even as a negative.

It is critical for the document not delivering any confusion. Keeping
the doc with a clear clarification, or deleting the useless doc, both
are much better than obsolete info.

> Of course this all depends on whether we decide the Android build
> _should_ be working or not which looks like is also being discussed here.

Yeah, I think the important thing is to get clang/LLVM cross build to
work. This is the prerequisites for using Android NDK.

Thanks,
Leo