linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
@ 2026-07-30 11:53 Ridong
  2026-07-30 15:16 ` Tao Cui
  2026-07-30 16:03 ` Johannes Weiner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ridong @ 2026-07-30 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt,
	Andrew Morton
  Cc: Muchun Song, David Finkel, Michal Koutný, Tejun Heo, cgroups,
	linux-mm, linux-kernel, Ridong Chen, Ridong Chen

From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>

Writing to memory.peak resets the peak for that fd only. Each fd is a
watcher and reads back max(its own value, the shared local_watermark).

peak_write() resets by lowering local_watermark to the current usage.
To keep the other watchers' peaks it then walks the watcher list, but it
stores the current usage into them instead of the old watermark. So once
usage has dropped from a peak, a reset on one fd wrongly drags every
other fd's peak down too, even fds that never reset.

Reproduced on 7.2.0-rc5-next under QEMU, two fds A and B on one cgroup:
B sees the peak (410624 KB), usage drops, then A resets -- and B's peak
collapses to 1060 KB although B never reset. With this patch B keeps
reading 410624 KB.

Fix: save the old watermark before lowering it and use that to floor the
other watchers, so a reset only affects the fd that issued it.

Fixes: c6f53ed8f213 ("mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 60145aadfc5e..881e7c459c64 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4692,7 +4692,7 @@ static ssize_t peak_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes,
 			  loff_t off, struct page_counter *pc,
 			  struct list_head *watchers)
 {
-	unsigned long usage;
+	unsigned long usage, old_watermark;
 	struct cgroup_of_peak *peer_ctx;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
 	struct cgroup_of_peak *ofp = of_peak(of);
@@ -4700,11 +4700,12 @@ static ssize_t peak_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes,
 	spin_lock(&memcg->peaks_lock);
 
 	usage = page_counter_read(pc);
+	old_watermark = READ_ONCE(pc->local_watermark);
 	WRITE_ONCE(pc->local_watermark, usage);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(peer_ctx, watchers, list)
-		if (usage > peer_ctx->value)
-			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, usage);
+		if (peer_ctx != ofp && old_watermark > peer_ctx->value)
+			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, old_watermark);
 
 	/* initial write, register watcher */
 	if (ofp->value == OFP_PEAK_UNSET)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
  2026-07-30 11:53 [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark Ridong
@ 2026-07-30 15:16 ` Tao Cui
  2026-07-30 16:03 ` Johannes Weiner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tao Cui @ 2026-07-30 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ridong, Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin,
	Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton
  Cc: cui.tao, Muchun Song, David Finkel, Michal Koutný, Tejun Heo,
	cgroups, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Ridong Chen



在 2026/7/30 19:53, Ridong 写道:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> 
> Writing to memory.peak resets the peak for that fd only. Each fd is a
> watcher and reads back max(its own value, the shared local_watermark).
> 
> peak_write() resets by lowering local_watermark to the current usage.
> To keep the other watchers' peaks it then walks the watcher list, but it
> stores the current usage into them instead of the old watermark. So once
> usage has dropped from a peak, a reset on one fd wrongly drags every
> other fd's peak down too, even fds that never reset.
> 
> Reproduced on 7.2.0-rc5-next under QEMU, two fds A and B on one cgroup:
> B sees the peak (410624 KB), usage drops, then A resets -- and B's peak
> collapses to 1060 KB although B never reset. With this patch B keeps
> reading 410624 KB.
> 
> Fix: save the old watermark before lowering it and use that to floor the
> other watchers, so a reset only affects the fd that issued it.
> 
> Fixes: c6f53ed8f213 ("mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 60145aadfc5e..881e7c459c64 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4692,7 +4692,7 @@ static ssize_t peak_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes,
>  			  loff_t off, struct page_counter *pc,
>  			  struct list_head *watchers)
>  {
> -	unsigned long usage;
> +	unsigned long usage, old_watermark;
>  	struct cgroup_of_peak *peer_ctx;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
>  	struct cgroup_of_peak *ofp = of_peak(of);
> @@ -4700,11 +4700,12 @@ static ssize_t peak_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes,
>  	spin_lock(&memcg->peaks_lock);
>  
>  	usage = page_counter_read(pc);
> +	old_watermark = READ_ONCE(pc->local_watermark);
>  	WRITE_ONCE(pc->local_watermark, usage);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(peer_ctx, watchers, list)
> -		if (usage > peer_ctx->value)
> -			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, usage);
> +		if (peer_ctx != ofp && old_watermark > peer_ctx->value)
> +			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, old_watermark);
>  
>  	/* initial write, register watcher */
>  	if (ofp->value == OFP_PEAK_UNSET)
Acked-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
  2026-07-30 11:53 [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark Ridong
  2026-07-30 15:16 ` Tao Cui
@ 2026-07-30 16:03 ` Johannes Weiner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2026-07-30 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ridong
  Cc: Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton,
	Muchun Song, David Finkel, Michal Koutný, Tejun Heo, cgroups,
	linux-mm, linux-kernel, Ridong Chen

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 07:53:14PM +0800, Ridong wrote:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> 
> Writing to memory.peak resets the peak for that fd only. Each fd is a
> watcher and reads back max(its own value, the shared local_watermark).
> 
> peak_write() resets by lowering local_watermark to the current usage.
> To keep the other watchers' peaks it then walks the watcher list, but it
> stores the current usage into them instead of the old watermark. So once
> usage has dropped from a peak, a reset on one fd wrongly drags every
> other fd's peak down too, even fds that never reset.
> 
> Reproduced on 7.2.0-rc5-next under QEMU, two fds A and B on one cgroup:
> B sees the peak (410624 KB), usage drops, then A resets -- and B's peak
> collapses to 1060 KB although B never reset. With this patch B keeps
> reading 410624 KB.
> 
> Fix: save the old watermark before lowering it and use that to floor the
> other watchers, so a reset only affects the fd that issued it.
> 
> Fixes: c6f53ed8f213 ("mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 60145aadfc5e..881e7c459c64 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4692,7 +4692,7 @@ static ssize_t peak_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes,
>  			  loff_t off, struct page_counter *pc,
>  			  struct list_head *watchers)
>  {
> -	unsigned long usage;
> +	unsigned long usage, old_watermark;
>  	struct cgroup_of_peak *peer_ctx;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
>  	struct cgroup_of_peak *ofp = of_peak(of);
> @@ -4700,11 +4700,12 @@ static ssize_t peak_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t nbytes,
>  	spin_lock(&memcg->peaks_lock);
>  
>  	usage = page_counter_read(pc);
> +	old_watermark = READ_ONCE(pc->local_watermark);
>  	WRITE_ONCE(pc->local_watermark, usage);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(peer_ctx, watchers, list)
> -		if (usage > peer_ctx->value)
> -			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, usage);
> +		if (peer_ctx != ofp && old_watermark > peer_ctx->value)
> +			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, old_watermark);

Ah, because B was previously reporting the higher local_watermark, and
its peer_ctx->value was actually low. Fixing it to current usage is
wrong in that case. It must remember local_watermark.

What about if usage is bigger than old_watermark? Then we don't update
the peer_ctx just yet. local_watermark is updated and propagated into
the peers on the next reset. I guess it's correct, but it's kind of
tricky to follow.

Would it be easier to understand if we mirrored the max() from
peak_show() here?

	usage = page_counter_read(pc);
	local_watermark = READ_ONCE(pc->local_watermark);
	WRITE_ONCE(pc->local_watermark, usage);

	peer_watermark = max(usage, local_watermark);
	list_for_each_entry(...)
		if (peer_ctx != ofp && peer_watermark > peer_ctx->value)
			WRITE_ONCE(peer_ctx->value, peer_watermark);

This code hurts my head. No strong feelings either way ;)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-30 16:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-30 11:53 [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark Ridong
2026-07-30 15:16 ` Tao Cui
2026-07-30 16:03 ` Johannes Weiner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).