public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
	Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
	<regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fall back to kcalloc() for no SCM device bound
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:46:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d720d86f-91fc-4e70-92fe-668413df826f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240909-tzmem-null-ptr-v1-2-96526c421bac@linaro.org>

On 9/9/24 11:38, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> Older platforms don't have an actual SCM device tied into the driver
> model and so there's no struct device which to use with the TZ Mem API.
> We need to fall-back to kcalloc() when allocating the buffer for
> additional SMC arguments on such platforms which don't even probe the SCM
> driver and never create the TZMem pool.
>
> Fixes: 449d0d84bcd8 ("firmware: qcom: scm: smc: switch to using the SCM allocator")
> Reported-by: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/692cfe9a-8c05-4ce4-813e-82b3f310019a@gmail.com/<S-Del>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm-smc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm-smc.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm-smc.c
> index 2b4c2826f572..13f72541033c 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm-smc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm-smc.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,15 @@ static int __scm_smc_do(struct device *dev, struct arm_smccc_args *smc,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static void smc_args_free(void *ptr)
> +{
> +	if (qcom_scm_get_tzmem_pool())
> +		qcom_tzmem_free(ptr);
> +	else
> +		kfree(ptr);
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_FREE(smc_args, void *, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) smc_args_free(_T));
>   
>   int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>   		   enum qcom_scm_convention qcom_convention,
> @@ -155,7 +164,7 @@ int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>   	struct qcom_tzmem_pool *mempool = qcom_scm_get_tzmem_pool();
>   	int arglen = desc->arginfo & 0xf;
>   	int i, ret;
> -	void *args_virt __free(qcom_tzmem) = NULL;
> +	void *args_virt __free(smc_args) = NULL;
>   	gfp_t flag = atomic ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
>   	u32 smccc_call_type = atomic ? ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL : ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL;
>   	u32 qcom_smccc_convention = (qcom_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32) ?
> @@ -173,9 +182,20 @@ int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>   		smc.args[i + SCM_SMC_FIRST_REG_IDX] = desc->args[i];
>   
>   	if (unlikely(arglen > SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS)) {
> -		args_virt = qcom_tzmem_alloc(mempool,
> -					     SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS * sizeof(u64),
> -					     flag);
> +		/*
> +		 * Older platforms don't have an entry for SCM in device-tree
> +		 * and so no device is bound to the SCM driver. This means there
> +		 * is no struct device for the TZ Mem API. Fall back to
> +		 * kcalloc() on such platforms.
> +		 */
> +		if (mempool)
> +			args_virt = qcom_tzmem_alloc(
> +					mempool,
> +					SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS * sizeof(u64),
> +					flag);
> +		else
> +			args_virt = kcalloc(SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS, sizeof(u64),
> +					    flag);
>   		if (!args_virt)
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   
>

Tested-by: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@gmail.com>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-10  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-09 18:38 [PATCH 0/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fix SMC calls on ARM32 Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-09 18:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fix a NULL-pointer dereference Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-09 20:06   ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-10  6:45   ` Rudraksha Gupta
2024-09-09 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fall back to kcalloc() for no SCM device bound Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-09 20:10   ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-09 21:04   ` Elliot Berman
2024-09-10  8:37     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-10 11:06     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-09-11 11:41       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-11 11:55         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-09-11 18:01         ` Rudraksha Gupta
2024-09-11 19:44           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-10  6:46   ` Rudraksha Gupta [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d720d86f-91fc-4e70-92fe-668413df826f@gmail.com \
    --to=guptarud@gmail.com \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox