Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.15-rc4

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

On 4/25/25 12:59, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 
> Another use case was Valve who wanted to support Windows games that
> expcted case folding to work.  (Microsoft Windows; the gift that keeps
> on giving...)  In fact the engineer who worked on case folding was
> paid by Valve to do the work.
> 
> That being said, I completely agree with Linus that case insensitivity
> is a nightmare, and I don't really care about performance.  The use
> cases where people care about this don't have directories with a large
> number of entries, and we **really** don't want to encourage more use
> of case insensitive lookups.  There's a reason why spent much effort
> improving the CLI tools' support for case folding.  It's good enough
> that it works for Android and Valve, and that's fine.
> 
[...]
> 
> Perhaps if we were going to do it all over, we might have only
> supported ASCII, or ISO Latin-1, and not used Unicode at all.  But
> then I'm sure Valve or Android mobile handset manufacturers would be
> unhappy that this might not be good enough for some country that they
> want to sell into, like, say, Japan or more generally, any country
> beyond US and Europe.
> 
> What we probably could do is to create our own table that didn't
> support all Unicode scripts, but only the ones which are required by
> Valve and Android.  But that would require someone willing to do this
> work on a volunteer basis, or confinuce some company to pay to do this
> work.  We could probably reduce the kernel size by doing this, and it
> would probably make the code more maintainable.  I'm just not sure
> anyone thinks its worthwhile to invest more into it.  In fact, I'm a
> bit surprised Kent decided he wanted to add this feature into bcachefs.
> 
> Sometimes, partitioning a feature which is only needed for backwards
> compatibiltiy with is in fact the right approach.  And throwing good
> money after bad is rarely worth it.
> 

[Yes, I realize I'm really late to weigh in on this discussion]

It is worth noting that Microsoft has basically declared their 
"recommended" case folding (upcase) table to be permanently frozen (for 
new filesystem instances in the case where they use an on-disk 
translation table created at format time.)  As far as I know they have 
never supported anything other than 1:1 conversion of BMP code points, 
nor normalization.

The exFAT specification enumerates the full recommended upcase table, 
although in a somewhat annoying format (basically a hex dump of 
compressed data):

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/exfat-specification

This is basically an admission that the problems involved with case 
folding are unsolvable, and just puts a tourniquet on the wound.

It also means that "legacy OS compatibility" is really a totally 
different problem than "proper Unicode normalization" and that the 
former far more limited in scope.

	-hpa