public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhengzucheng <zhengzucheng@huawei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	<Jun.Ma2@amd.com>, <cve@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-26650: platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:50:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da7e8c85-52fd-b2f4-83da-751f812de6ae@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zkz2qpUP-HVROO1I@tiehlicka>


在 2024/5/22 3:31, Michal Hocko 写道:
> This patch has been reverted in upstream by 03c6284df179 ("Revert
> "drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix potential ioremap() memory leaks in
> amdgpu_device_init()"") and based on the changelog the CVE should be
> rejected.

hi Michal Hocko

This reverted patch was previously used to resolve CVE-2024-35928 ?

so CVE-2024-35928 should be rejected?


commit 03c6284df179de3a4a6e0684764b1c71d2a405e2
Author: Ma Jun <Jun.Ma2@amd.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 19 15:24:03 2024 +0800

     Revert "drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix potential ioremap() memory leaks in 
amdgpu_device_init()"

     This patch causes the following iounmap erorr and calltrace
     iounmap: bad address 00000000d0b3631f

     The original patch was unjustified because amdgpu_device_fini_sw() will
     always cleanup the rmmio mapping.

     This reverts commit eb4f139888f636614dab3bcce97ff61cefc4b3a7.

     Signed-off-by: Ma Jun <Jun.Ma2@amd.com>
     Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
     Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
     Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>


> On Tue 26-03-24 17:50:16, Lee Jones wrote:
>> Description
>> ===========
>>
>> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>>
>> platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe
>>
>> p2sb_bar() unhides P2SB device to get resources from the device. It
>> guards the operation by locking pci_rescan_remove_lock so that parallel
>> rescans do not find the P2SB device. However, this lock causes deadlock
>> when PCI bus rescan is triggered by /sys/bus/pci/rescan. The rescan
>> locks pci_rescan_remove_lock and probes PCI devices. When PCI devices
>> call p2sb_bar() during probe, it locks pci_rescan_remove_lock again.
>> Hence the deadlock.
>>
>> To avoid the deadlock, do not lock pci_rescan_remove_lock in p2sb_bar().
>> Instead, do the lock at fs_initcall. Introduce p2sb_cache_resources()
>> for fs_initcall which gets and caches the P2SB resources. At p2sb_bar(),
>> refer the cache and return to the caller.
>>
>> Before operating the device at P2SB DEVFN for resource cache, check
>> that its device class is PCI_CLASS_MEMORY_OTHER 0x0580 that PCH
>> specifications define. This avoids unexpected operation to other devices
>> at the same DEVFN.
>>
>> Tested-by Klara Modin <klarasmodin@gmail.com>
>>
>> The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-26650 to this issue.
>>
>>
>> Affected and fixed versions
>> ===========================
>>
>> 	Issue introduced in 6.0 with commit 9745fb07474f and fixed in 6.1.76 with commit 2841631a0365
>> 	Issue introduced in 6.0 with commit 9745fb07474f and fixed in 6.6.15 with commit 847e1eb30e26
>> 	Issue introduced in 6.0 with commit 9745fb07474f and fixed in 6.7.3 with commit d281ac9a987c
>> 	Issue introduced in 6.0 with commit 9745fb07474f and fixed in 6.8 with commit 5913320eb0b3
>>
>> Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
>> kernel versions by the kernel community.
>>
>> Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
>> older supported kernel versions.  The official CVE entry at
>> 	https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2024-26650
>> will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
>> up to date information about this issue.
>>
>>
>> Affected files
>> ==============
>>
>> The file(s) affected by this issue are:
>> 	drivers/platform/x86/p2sb.c
>>
>>
>> Mitigation
>> ==========
>>
>> The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
>> stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes.  Individual
>> changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
>> release.  Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
>> supported by the Linux kernel community at all.  If however, updating to
>> the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
>> issue can be found at these commits:
>> 	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2841631a03652f32b595c563695d0461072e0de4
>> 	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/847e1eb30e269a094da046c08273abe3f3361cf2
>> 	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d281ac9a987c553d93211b90fd4fe97d8eca32cd
>> 	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5913320eb0b3ec88158cfcb0fa5e996bf4ef681b

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240326175007.1388794-18-lee@kernel.org>
2024-05-21 19:31 ` CVE-2024-26650: platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe Michal Hocko
2024-05-22  4:10   ` Greg KH
2024-05-23  8:50   ` zhengzucheng [this message]
2024-05-23 13:51     ` Greg KH
2024-05-24 10:33       ` Michal Hocko
2024-05-24 10:33   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da7e8c85-52fd-b2f4-83da-751f812de6ae@huawei.com \
    --to=zhengzucheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=Jun.Ma2@amd.com \
    --cc=cve@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox