Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC

[Marek Vasut]

On 4/7/26 11:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add DT overlay for the DSI-to-LVDS adapter eDM-MOD-iMX8Mm-LVDS populated
> with Lontium LT9211 bridge. This adapter can be optionally populated onto
> the eDM SBC. This adapter can be extended with multiple panels, currently
> supported are the following:
> 
> - AUO G215HVN011
> - Innolux G070Y2-L01
> - Innolux G101ICE-L01
> - Innolux G121XCE-L01
> - Innolux G156HCE-L01
> - Multi-Inno Technology MI0700A2T-30
> - Multi-Inno Technology MI1010Z1T-1CP11
> 
> Note that in case of the i.MX8M Plus eDM SBC, the adapter name containing
> iMX8Mm is not a typo, this is the adapter model string. The adapter was
> originally developed for the iMX8Mm eDM SBC.

Hello Frank,

this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ?

Thank you for your help!

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC

[Frank Li]

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 01:21:43PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 4/7/26 11:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Add DT overlay for the DSI-to-LVDS adapter eDM-MOD-iMX8Mm-LVDS populated
> > with Lontium LT9211 bridge. This adapter can be optionally populated onto
> > the eDM SBC. This adapter can be extended with multiple panels, currently
> > supported are the following:
> >
> > - AUO G215HVN011
> > - Innolux G070Y2-L01
> > - Innolux G101ICE-L01
> > - Innolux G121XCE-L01
> > - Innolux G156HCE-L01
> > - Multi-Inno Technology MI0700A2T-30
> > - Multi-Inno Technology MI1010Z1T-1CP11
> >
> > Note that in case of the i.MX8M Plus eDM SBC, the adapter name containing
> > iMX8Mm is not a typo, this is the adapter model string. The adapter was
> > originally developed for the iMX8Mm eDM SBC.
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ?

I am thinking about it. I found an old thread
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/

The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and
irq map for connector.

Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio
boards, which almost done to send out to review.

I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M
problem.

Frank

>
> Thank you for your help!

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC

[Marek Vasut]

On 5/8/26 5:46 PM, Frank Li wrote:

Hello Frank,

>> this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ?
> 
> I am thinking about it. I found an old thread
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/
> 
> The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and
> irq map for connector.
> 
> Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio
> boards, which almost done to send out to review.
> 
> I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M
> problem.
DT connectors have been discussed for the last 10 or so years and three 
is still no real progress.

I would be happy to send a follow up patchset which would convert the 
DTOs to whatever connector implementation format lands in the future, 
but I am concerned that waiting for DT connectors will block this 
patchset from landing for a long time.

So how about finalizing this patchset, landing it, and once connectors 
become available, I will send a follow up conversion patchset ? Would 
that be workable for you ?

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC

[Frank Li]

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/8/26 5:46 PM, Frank Li wrote:
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> > > this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ?
> >
> > I am thinking about it. I found an old thread
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/
> >
> > The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and
> > irq map for connector.
> >
> > Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio
> > boards, which almost done to send out to review.
> >
> > I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M
> > problem.
> DT connectors have been discussed for the last 10 or so years and three is
> still no real progress.
>
> I would be happy to send a follow up patchset which would convert the DTOs
> to whatever connector implementation format lands in the future, but I am
> concerned that waiting for DT connectors will block this patchset from
> landing for a long time.
>
> So how about finalizing this patchset, landing it, and once connectors
> become available, I will send a follow up conversion patchset ? Would that
> be workable for you ?

We still have times, can you wait for chancel liu's patch for a while to
check if his method can help this situation.

Frank

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC

[Marek Vasut]

On 5/8/26 10:15 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/8/26 5:46 PM, Frank Li wrote:
>>
>> Hello Frank,
>>
>>>> this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ?
>>>
>>> I am thinking about it. I found an old thread
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/
>>>
>>> The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and
>>> irq map for connector.
>>>
>>> Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio
>>> boards, which almost done to send out to review.
>>>
>>> I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M
>>> problem.
>> DT connectors have been discussed for the last 10 or so years and three is
>> still no real progress.
>>
>> I would be happy to send a follow up patchset which would convert the DTOs
>> to whatever connector implementation format lands in the future, but I am
>> concerned that waiting for DT connectors will block this patchset from
>> landing for a long time.
>>
>> So how about finalizing this patchset, landing it, and once connectors
>> become available, I will send a follow up conversion patchset ? Would that
>> be workable for you ?
> 
> We still have times, can you wait for chancel liu's patch for a while to
> check if his method can help this situation.
Do you know when chancel liu's patch is going to be submitted ?

Is there maybe some preliminary version I can try ?

Thank you for your help !