From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] Multidevice f2fs mount after disk rearrangement
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:41:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e773d576-9458-48d7-bad4-dd4f8c61ebd3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c4cafd35d1595a62134203669d7c244@natalenko.name>
Hello,
Thanks for the report. :)
On 2020/1/5 5:52, Oleksandr Natalenko via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 04.01.2020 17:29, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
>> I was brave enough to create f2fs filesystem spanning through 2
>> physical device using this command:
>>
>> # mkfs.f2fs -t 0 /dev/sdc -c /dev/sdd
>>
>> It worked fine until I removed /dev/sdb from my system, so f2fs devices
>> became:
>>
>> /dev/sdc -> /dev/sdb
>> /dev/sdd -> /dev/sdc
>>
>> Now, when I try to mount it, I get the following:
>>
>> # mount -t f2fs /dev/sdb /mnt/fs
>> mount: /mnt/fs: mount(2) system call failed: No such file or directory.
>>
>> In dmesg:
>>
>> [Jan 4 17:25] F2FS-fs (sdb): Mount Device [ 0]: /dev/sdc,
>> 59063, 0 - 1cd6fff
>> [ +0,000024] F2FS-fs (sdb): Failed to find devices
>>
>> fsck also fails with the following assertion:
>>
>> [ASSERT] (init_sb_info: 908) !strcmp((char *)sb->devs[i].path, (char
>> *)c.devices[i].path)
>>
>> Am I doing something obviously stupid, and the device path can be
>> (somehow) changed so that the mount succeeds, or this is unfixable,
>> and f2fs relies on persistent device naming?
>>
>> Please suggest.
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> Erm, fine. I studied f2fs-tools code a little bit and discovered that
> superblock indeed had /dev/sdX paths saved as strings. So I fired up
> hexedit and just changed the superblock directly on the first device,
> substituting sdc with sdb and sdd with sdc (I did it twice; I guess
> there are 2 copies of superblock), and after this the mount worked.
Alright, it works if superblock checksum feature is off...
>
> Am I really supposed to do this manually ;)?
We'd better add that ability in tune.f2fs. And I guess we need to let
kernel/fsck to notice that case, and give hint to run tune.f2fs to
reconfigure primary/secondary/... device paths.
Thanks,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-04 16:29 Multidevice f2fs mount after disk rearrangement Oleksandr Natalenko
2020-01-04 21:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2020-01-06 3:41 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2020-01-06 18:40 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-01-08 8:37 ` Chao Yu
2020-01-06 18:34 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-01-06 18:40 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2020-01-08 8:52 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-01-08 12:00 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e773d576-9458-48d7-bad4-dd4f8c61ebd3@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox