Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] drm/panfrost: Support ARM_64_LPAE_S1 page table

[Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>]

Hi Boris,

On 2/27/25 11:55 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:30:42 -0300
> Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com> wrote:
> 
>> @@ -642,8 +713,15 @@ struct panfrost_mmu *panfrost_mmu_ctx_create(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>>   		.iommu_dev	= pfdev->dev,
>>   	};
>>   
>> -	mmu->pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(ARM_MALI_LPAE, &mmu->pgtbl_cfg,
>> -					      mmu);
>> +	if (panfrost_has_hw_feature(pfdev, HW_FEATURE_AARCH64_MMU)) {
>> +		fmt = ARM_64_LPAE_S1;
>> +		mmu->enable = mmu_lpae_s1_enable;
>> +	} else {
>> +		fmt = ARM_MALI_LPAE;
>> +		mmu->enable = mmu_mali_lpae_enable;
>> +	}
> 
> How about we stick to the legacy pgtable format for all currently
> supported GPUs, and make this an opt-in property attached to the
> compatible. This way, we can progressively move away from the legacy
> format once enough testing has been done, while allowing support for
> GPUs that can't use the old format because the cachability/shareability
> configuration is too limited.

Indeed, that's a better way to go.

Specifically, what you mean is: keep the same compatible string and add 
a new property to the `panfrost_compatible` private data for that 
specific variant? E.g.

In drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c:
```
struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8188_data
[...]
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-mali", .data = &mediatek_mt8188_data },
```

Thanks,

-- 
Ariel D'Alessandro
Software Engineer

Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK 
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718