From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] nvmet-fcloop: allocate/free fcloop_lsreq directly
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:18:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef064271-7328-41b9-8df0-b4a3639ae33f@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423-nvmet-fcloop-v5-9-3d7f968728a5@kernel.org>
On 4/23/25 15:21, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> fcloop depends on the host or the target to allocate the fcloop_lsreq
> object. This means that the lifetime of the fcloop_lsreq is tied to
> either the host or the target. Consequently, the host or the target must
> cooperate during shutdown.
>
> Unfortunately, this approach does not work well when the target forces a
> shutdown, as there are dependencies that are difficult to resolve in a
> clean way.
>
> The simplest solution is to decouple the lifetime of the fcloop_lsreq
> object by managing them directly within fcloop. Since this is not a
> performance-critical path and only a small number of LS objects are used
> during setup and cleanup, it does not significantly impact performance
> to allocate them during normal operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 13:21 [PATCH v5 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc and track lport Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_delete_local_port Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:16 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] nvmet-fcloop: update refs on tfcp_req Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] nvmet-fcloop: add missing fcloop_callback_host_done Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:26 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] nvmet-fcloop: access fcpreq only when holding reqlock Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:31 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] nvmet-fcloop: prevent double port deletion Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:32 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] nvmet-fcloop: allocate/free fcloop_lsreq directly Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:18 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-05-07 10:48 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] nvmet-fcloop: don't wait for lport cleanup Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:48 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 12:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 12:58 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] nvmet-fcloop: drop response if targetport is gone Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] nvmet-fc: take tgtport refs for portentry Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] nvme-fc: do not reference lsrsp after failure Daniel Wagner
2025-05-06 16:36 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef064271-7328-41b9-8df0-b4a3639ae33f@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox