From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM <denis.osterland@diehl.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pps: add epoll support
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:36:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6bed779-6d59-4f0f-8a59-b6312bd83b4e@enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11965b8b6101487996df902d35ba2ea3@diehl.com>
On 25/02/25 17:34, Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 3:24 PM
>> To: Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM <denis.osterland@diehl.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pps: add epoll support
>>
> [snip]
>>
>>> If I start multiple user space programs data races are visible.
>>>
>>> ```
>>> # for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6; do PpsPollTest /dev/pps1 > log$i & done
>>> # sleep 6
>>> # tail log*
>>> ==> log0 <==
>>> timeout
>>> assert: 196
>>> time: 1520599554.276752928
>>> assert: 197
>>> time: 1520599555.300692704
>>
>> This is the same behavior we have when working with a serial port: if more than
>> one process gets access to it, data is stolen.
> Okay, then lets choose your suggestion.
>
>>
>>> >From my point of view it would be great to fix this bug without such an limitation.
>>
>> I disagree, it is not a limitation! It is like a normal char device work.
>>
>> What we have to test now is if your initial goal has been addressed! That is, in
>> an application that has more to do than just dealing with one PPS device, we can
>> use poll()/select() in order to avoid using threads.
> I will do the final test.
Try poll() by using a process workin on multiple pps sources.
> I expect that it works with your patch.
:)
> Shall I prepare the patch?
Yes.
> Shall I add you as Co-author?
Yes. Add my name in the Signed-off-by: line and, please, send to me a preview.
> Or do you want to send your patch with me in reported-by and tested-by?
>
> Fixes: eae9d2ba0cfc ("LinuxPPS: core support")?
OK.
> CC stable?
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
And explain the goal of the patch within the description.
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 16:34 Re: [PATCH] pps: add epoll support Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-26 7:36 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-25 13:39 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-25 14:24 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-02-24 11:38 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-24 17:38 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-02-19 12:21 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-20 8:50 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-02-20 16:45 ` Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-21 9:17 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-01-20 13:10 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6bed779-6d59-4f0f-8a59-b6312bd83b4e@enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=denis.osterland@diehl.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox