From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>,
Saurav Sachidanand <sauravsc@amazon.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Akhil R <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>,
Kartik Rajput <kkartik@nvidia.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: tegra: make tegra_i2c_mutex_unlock() return void
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 16:14:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8441e42-e03f-48d1-aa6c-929afdeaf8f7@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af24ztuMvHkdyAx3@orome>
On 08/05/2026 11:24, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 10:11:45PM +0000, Saurav Sachidanand wrote:
>> tegra_i2c_mutex_unlock() returning an error that overwrites the transfer
>> result causes silent loss of I2C transfer errors. If the transfer failed
>> but the unlock succeeded, the error was lost and the function incorrectly
>> reported success.
>>
>> Rather than propagating the unlock error (which is not actionable by the
>> caller - the I2C message may have been sent regardless), convert the
>> function to return void and WARN on the unexpected condition. If the
>> unlock fails, subsequent lock attempts will fail anyway, making the error
>> visible on the next transfer.
>
> Technically I don't think it's guaranteed that a subsequent lock attempt
> will fail. For example, if the SW mutex was somehow held by some other
> owner while trying to unlock, by the time we try to lock later on that
> owner might have released the SW mutex again.
>
> Obviously if we've managed to lock the SW mutex but fail to unlock
> because somebody else was holding it, it means that the other party did
> not respect the SW mutex protocol, in which case anything goes.
>
> Anyway, this looks good to me, so:
>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Thanks
Jon
--
nvpublic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 19:53 [PATCH 1/1] i2c: tegra: fix error handling in tegra_i2c_xfer() Saurav Sachidanand
2026-05-07 7:23 ` Jon Hunter
2026-05-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Saurav Sachidanand
2026-05-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: fix pm_runtime leak on mutex_lock failure Saurav Sachidanand
2026-05-08 10:24 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-08 15:13 ` Jon Hunter
2026-05-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: tegra: make tegra_i2c_mutex_unlock() return void Saurav Sachidanand
2026-05-08 10:24 ` Thierry Reding
2026-05-08 15:14 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8441e42-e03f-48d1-aa6c-929afdeaf8f7@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=akhilrajeev@nvidia.com \
--cc=kkartik@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sauravsc@amazon.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox