From: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"paulmck@kernel.org" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"longman@redhat.com" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use topology_max_packages() to get package number
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:00:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9da97d86e5599edca74fa859053ba9caf2b4d9c.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce02f1a8-870f-41bc-8650-4bd6103f9637@intel.com>
On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 10:58 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/15/24 04:26, Feng Tang wrote:
> > Thomas' recent patchset of refactoring x86 topology code introduces
> > topology_max_package(),
s/topology_max_package/topology_max_packages
And topology_max_packages() is not new. The patch set actually
improves/fixes it.
>
> I also did a big *gulp* when I saw this:
>
> #define topology_max_packages() (__max_logical_packages)
>
> and:
>
> > /*
> > * Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogeneous
> > systems so
> > * extrapolate the boot cpu's data to all packages.
> > */
> > ncpus = cpu_data(0).booted_cores *
> > topology_max_smt_threads();
> > __max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(total_cpus, ncpus);
>
> Because Intel obviously has heterogeneous systems today.
>
Dave, I think you were checking the old code.
Please refer to commit 090610ba704a ("x86/cpu/topology: Use topology
bitmaps for sizing"), which is just merged in this merge window.
thanks,
rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-17 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-15 11:26 [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use topology_max_packages() to get package number Feng Tang
2024-03-15 17:58 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-15 20:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-18 1:03 ` Feng Tang
2024-03-17 12:00 ` Zhang, Rui [this message]
2024-03-18 1:18 ` Feng Tang
2024-03-18 15:08 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-18 1:16 ` Feng Tang
2024-03-18 2:03 ` Waiman Long
2024-03-18 1:57 ` Feng Tang
2024-03-18 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-19 2:11 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9da97d86e5599edca74fa859053ba9caf2b4d9c.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox