Re: [RFC] two new linux-next trees (SPI and devicetree)

[Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>]

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:27 -0700
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
>> I've made the offer to be SPI
>> co-maintainer,
>
> OK by me.  Don't break anything.

I'll do my best.

> My current stash:
>
>
> atmel_spi-fix-dma-addr-calculation-for-len-buffer_size.patch
> spi-controller-driver-for-designware-spi-core.patch
> spi-add-pci-interface-driver-for-designware-spi-core.patch
> spi-add-pci-interface-driver-for-designware-spi-core-fix.patch
> spi-controller-driver-for-designware-spi-core-fix.patch
> spidev-add-proper-section-markers.patch
> spidev-use-declare_bitmap-instead-of-declaring-the-array.patch
> spidev-use-declare_bitmap-instead-of-declaring-the-array-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> spi-drain-mxc-spi-transfer-buffer-when-probing-device.patch
> spi_s3c24xx-add-fiq-pseudo-dma-support.patch

Since they're already in your tree, do you mind continuing to shepherd
these (either merge or drop)?  I've gotten a patchwork project set up
on kernel.org for the spi mailing list, so I can easily track things
from this point on.  My gameplan at this point is to try and stay on
top of the things that I'm familiar with (mostly powerpc) and depend
on other people to ack the rest.  I'll pick up anything that a)
doesn't look ugly, b) isn't contested, and c) applies.  :-)

>> but I haven't received any feedback yet from either
>> akpm or dbrownell.
>
> I haven't heard anything from David in over a month.

Okay, shall I go ahead and merge my change to MAINTAINERS through my
tree too then?

g.


-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.