From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
kir@swsoft.com, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
kir@openvz.org, Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:46:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18x5pte18.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071026191845.fd0f75c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:18:45 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:04:08 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > be happy to hear if someone has a better idea.
>>
>> There is a difference between "complete the feature" and "early adopters
>> to start playing with the feature" on the one side, and making something
>> available in a released kernel on the other side.
>>
>> For development and playing with it it can depend on BROKEN (perhaps
>> with the dependency removed through the first -rc kernels), but as soon
>> as it's available in a -final kernel the ABI is fixed.
>>
>
> Yes, if we're not 100% certain that the interfaces are correnct and unchanging
> and that the implementation is solid, we should disable the feature at Kconfig
> time.
Reasonable. So far things look good for a single pid namespace. Multiple
pid namespaces look iffy.
> The best option would be to fix things asap. But assuming that option isn't
> reasonable and/or safe, we can slip a `depends on BROKEN' into -rc6 then
> resume development for 2.6.25.
I think we can make a lot of progress but there is enough development
yet to do to reach the target of correct and unchanging interfaces,
with a solid interface. That unless we achieve a breakthrough I
don't see us achieving that target for 2.6.24.
The outstanding issues I can think of off the top of my head:
- signal handling for init on secondary pid namespaces.
- Properly setting si_pid on signals that cross namespaces.
- The kthread API conversion so we don't get kernel threads
trapped in pid namespaces and make them unfreeable.
- At fork time I think we are doing a little bit too much work
in setting the session and the pgrp, and removing the controlling
tty.
- AF_unix domain credential passing.
- misc pid vs vpid sorting out (autofs autofs4, coda, arch specific
syscalls, others?)
- Removal of task->pid, task->tgid, task->signal->__pgrp,
tsk->signal->__session or some other way to ensure that we have
touched and converted all of the kernel pid handling.
- flock pid handling.
It hurts me to even ponder what thinking makes it that
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL isn't enough to keep a stable distro
from shipping the code in their stable kernel, and locking us into
trouble.
With that said. I think I should just respin the patchset now and add
the "depends on BROKEN".
The user namespace appears to need that treatment as well.
The network namespace has so little there and it already depends
on !SYSFS so I don't think we are going to run into any trouble
with it. Happily I managed to parse that problem differently,
so I could slice of the parts of the networking stack that
had not been converted.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CBC546DD07068244AEC110EFEDA58B7235893F@excite.int.sw-soft.com>
2007-10-26 21:59 ` [Devel] [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2) Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-27 0:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-27 1:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-27 2:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-27 2:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-27 3:46 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-10-27 4:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-27 4:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-27 5:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-27 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-27 7:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-29 18:05 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-10-29 19:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-28 16:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-28 17:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-28 18:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-29 10:13 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-10-29 18:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-26 22:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m18x5pte18.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=kir@openvz.org \
--cc=kir@swsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox