* Why was this APM patch not fully applied?
@ 2000-12-29 2:45 John Fremlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: John Fremlin @ 2000-12-29 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: sfr
On Tue Apr 04 2000 - 23:19:12 EDT, Stephen Rothwell posted a patch to linux-kernel.
See http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2000week15/0481.html
To quote:
This patch (against 2.3.99pre4-4) does the following:
Allow user mode programs to reject standby and suspend operations.
[...]
This first item is important to me. Unfortunately, the patch no longer
applies to current kernels (test13-pre4). Was there any reason for it
not to be included, or was it just ignored accidently?
(The patch is still available at http://linuxcare.com.au/apm/ if anyone cares.)
--
http://www.penguinpowered.com/~vii
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-12-29 3:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-29 2:45 Why was this APM patch not fully applied? John Fremlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox