From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 23:17:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37ieb84ve.fsf@maximus.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080503202416.GR5838@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (Adrian Bunk's message of "Sat\, 3 May 2008 23\:24\:16 +0300")
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> writes:
> I'm not even sure the semantics of "select follows dependencies"
> would actually be better than what we have today.
I think it would. But how would that actually work? By displaying all
relevant dependency chains and asking the user to select one?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-03 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-30 20:03 [patch] input: JOYSTICK_XPAD build fix Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 21:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-04-30 21:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 23:01 ` Ingo, no more kconfig patches Adrian Bunk
2008-05-01 1:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-01 1:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-01 2:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-01 2:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-01 2:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-01 11:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-03 19:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-03 20:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-03 21:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 21:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-03 22:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-04 7:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-04 7:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 21:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-03 22:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-04 3:54 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-05-04 7:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 23:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-04 0:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 21:17 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2008-05-03 21:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 22:13 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-03 22:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 23:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-04 0:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-04 12:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37ieb84ve.fsf@maximus.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox