Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64()

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

On Tue, 23 May 2017 02:12:58 +0200,
Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 
> Looks like the function has never been used since it was added by commit
> b0d94acd634a ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld - add shim save restore"). Removing it
> fixes the following warning when building with clang:
> 
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c:360:20: error: unused function
>     'sst_restore_shim64' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>

Hmm, although this patch was already merged, I now think this is
rather a bug.  If the restore is never executed, why the counterpart,
sst_save_shim64() is required at all at runtime suspend?

Vinod?


thanks,

Takashi

> ---
>  sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> index f9ba71315e33..fb608d3a90c8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> @@ -397,22 +397,6 @@ static inline void sst_save_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void sst_restore_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
> -				      void __iomem *shim,
> -				      struct sst_shim_regs64 *shim_regs)
> -{
> -	unsigned long irq_flags;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * we only need to restore IMRX for this case, rest will be
> -	 * initialize by FW or driver when firmware is loaded
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> -	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx);
> -	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> -}
> -
>  void sst_configure_runtime_pm(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
>  {
>  	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(ctx->dev, SST_SUSPEND_DELAY);
> -- 
> 2.13.0.303.g4ebf302169-goog
> 
>