From: tip-bot for Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
lennart@poettering.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Drop all load weight manipulation for RT tasks
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:16:49 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-17bdcf949d03306b308c5fb694849cd35f119807@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286807811-10568-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Commit-ID: 17bdcf949d03306b308c5fb694849cd35f119807
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/17bdcf949d03306b308c5fb694849cd35f119807
Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:36:51 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:41:59 +0200
sched: Drop all load weight manipulation for RT tasks
Load weights are for the CFS, they do not belong in the RT task. This makes all
RT scheduling classes leave the CFS weights alone.
This fixes a real bug as well: I noticed the following phonomena: a process
elevated to SCHED_RR forks with SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK set, and the child is
indeed SCHED_OTHER, and the niceval is indeed reset to 0. However the weight
inserted by set_load_weight() remains at 0, giving the task insignificat
priority.
With this fix, the weight is reset to what the task had before being elevated
to SCHED_RR/SCHED_FIFO.
Cc: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1286807811-10568-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 6 ------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 5f64fed..728081a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1855,12 +1855,6 @@ static void dec_nr_running(struct rq *rq)
static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (task_has_rt_policy(p)) {
- p->se.load.weight = 0;
- p->se.load.inv_weight = WMULT_CONST;
- return;
- }
-
/*
* SCHED_IDLE tasks get minimal weight:
*/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-18 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 14:36 [PATCH] sched: drop all load weight manipulation for RT tasks Linus Walleij
2010-10-12 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 19:16 ` tip-bot for Linus Walleij [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-17bdcf949d03306b308c5fb694849cd35f119807@git.kernel.org \
--to=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox