public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Will Deacon <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/urgent] locking/atomic/bitops: Document and clarify ordering semantics for failed test_and_{}_bit()
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:28:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-61e02392d3c7ecac1f91c0a90a8043d67e081846@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518528619-20049-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

Commit-ID:  61e02392d3c7ecac1f91c0a90a8043d67e081846
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/61e02392d3c7ecac1f91c0a90a8043d67e081846
Author:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:30:19 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:55:53 +0100

locking/atomic/bitops: Document and clarify ordering semantics for failed test_and_{}_bit()

A test_and_{}_bit() operation fails if the value of the bit is such that
the modification does not take place. For example, if test_and_set_bit()
returns 1. In these cases, follow the behaviour of cmpxchg and allow the
operation to be unordered. This also applies to test_and_set_bit_lock()
if the lock is found to be be taken already.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1518528619-20049-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt   | 7 ++++++-
 include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt b/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt
index 5550bfdc..be70b32 100644
--- a/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt
+++ b/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt
@@ -58,7 +58,12 @@ Like with atomic_t, the rule of thumb is:
 
  - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered.
 
-Except for test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics and
+ - RMW operations that are conditional are unordered on FAILURE,
+   otherwise the above rules apply. In the case of test_and_{}_bit() operations,
+   if the bit in memory is unchanged by the operation then it is deemed to have
+   failed.
+
+Except for a successful test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics and
 clear_bit_unlock() which has RELEASE semantics.
 
 Since a platform only has a single means of achieving atomic operations
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
index bc39757..67ab280 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
  * @nr: Bit to set
  * @addr: Address to count from
  *
- * This operation is atomic and provides acquire barrier semantics.
+ * This operation is atomic and provides acquire barrier semantics if
+ * the returned value is 0.
  * It can be used to implement bit locks.
  */
 #define test_and_set_bit_lock(nr, addr)	test_and_set_bit(nr, addr)

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-13 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-13 13:30 [PATCH] atomic/bitops: Clarify ordering semantics for failed test_and_{}_bit() Will Deacon
2018-02-13 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-13 15:28 ` tip-bot for Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-61e02392d3c7ecac1f91c0a90a8043d67e081846@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox