* [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
@ 2016-02-08 14:36 Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-09 12:19 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-02-08 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, Jason Baron,
Peter Zijlstra (Intel), linux-kernel
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299e367f..915d75df2086 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
2016-02-08 14:36 [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions Arnd Bergmann
@ 2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-09 12:19 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Baron @ 2016-02-08 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann, Ingo Molnar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), linux-kernel
On 02/08/2016 09:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
>
> lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
> .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
> lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
> ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
>
> That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
> simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
Works for me.
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Thanks,
-Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid nested functions
2016-02-08 14:36 [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
@ 2016-02-09 12:19 ` tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-02-09 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: peterz, hpa, mingo, torvalds, linux-kernel, arnd, tglx, jbaron
Commit-ID: 975db45e9cc561bf8a7eddfa0705d3a078ec184f
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/975db45e9cc561bf8a7eddfa0705d3a078ec184f
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:36:52 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:27:29 +0100
locking/static_keys: Avoid nested functions
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to be a little too clever, so this simplifies it
a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454942223-2781480-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299..915d75d 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-09 12:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 14:36 [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-09 12:19 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox