* [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() in setup_irq().
@ 2011-02-10 0:04 David Daney
2011-02-10 23:30 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Call bus_lock/unlock functions " tip-bot for David Daney
2011-02-10 23:33 ` [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() " Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Daney @ 2011-02-10 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx; +Cc: linux-kernel, David Daney
irq_chips that supply .irq_bus_lock/.irq_bus_sync_unlock functions,
expect that the other chip methods will be called inside of calls to
the pair. If this expectation is not met, things tend to not work.
Make setup_irq() call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() too.
For the vast majority of irq_chips, this will be a NOP as most don't
have these bus lock functions.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 0caa59f..a00bf2c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -871,9 +871,14 @@ out_thread:
*/
int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *act)
{
+ int retval;
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
- return __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
+ chip_bus_lock(desc);
+ retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+
+ return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(setup_irq);
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [tip:irq/core] genirq: Call bus_lock/unlock functions in setup_irq()
2011-02-10 0:04 [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() in setup_irq() David Daney
@ 2011-02-10 23:30 ` tip-bot for David Daney
2011-02-10 23:33 ` [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() " Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for David Daney @ 2011-02-10 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, ddaney, tglx
Commit-ID: 986c011ddbb3ed44b35e1bfd67f6aa60b293b495
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/986c011ddbb3ed44b35e1bfd67f6aa60b293b495
Author: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:04:25 -0800
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:25:13 +0100
genirq: Call bus_lock/unlock functions in setup_irq()
irq_chips that supply .irq_bus_lock/.irq_bus_sync_unlock functions,
expect that the other chip methods will be called inside of calls to
the pair. If this expectation is not met, things tend to not work.
Make setup_irq() call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() too.
For the vast majority of irq_chips, this will be a NOP as most don't
have these bus lock functions.
[ tglx: No we don't want to call that in __setup_irq(). Way too many
error exit pathes. ]
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
LKML-Reference: <1297296265-18680-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 0caa59f..a00bf2c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -871,9 +871,14 @@ out_thread:
*/
int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *act)
{
+ int retval;
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
- return __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
+ chip_bus_lock(desc);
+ retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+
+ return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(setup_irq);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() in setup_irq().
2011-02-10 0:04 [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() in setup_irq() David Daney
2011-02-10 23:30 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Call bus_lock/unlock functions " tip-bot for David Daney
@ 2011-02-10 23:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-02-10 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Daney; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, David Daney wrote:
> irq_chips that supply .irq_bus_lock/.irq_bus_sync_unlock functions,
> expect that the other chip methods will be called inside of calls to
> the pair. If this expectation is not met, things tend to not work.
>
> Make setup_irq() call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() too.
>
> For the vast majority of irq_chips, this will be a NOP as most don't
> have these bus lock functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Ralf,
please pull that change from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git irq/for-mips
so you can apply David's patches which depend on that one.
That's 38-rc4 based w/o any other changes to the core code. I pull
that into irq/core so we have no dependecies or collision for Linus.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-10 23:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-10 0:04 [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() in setup_irq() David Daney
2011-02-10 23:30 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Call bus_lock/unlock functions " tip-bot for David Daney
2011-02-10 23:33 ` [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() " Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox