* [PATCH 1/2] usb: f_fs: refactor and document __ffs_ep0_read_events better
@ 2014-09-10 15:50 Michal Nazarewicz
2014-09-10 15:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON Michal Nazarewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Nazarewicz @ 2014-09-10 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felipe Balbi, Dan Carpenter; +Cc: linux-usb, linux-kernel, Michal Nazarewicz
Instead of using variable length array, use a static length equal to
the size of the ffs->ev.types array. This gets rid of a sparse warning:
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:401:44: warning:
Variable length array is used.
and makes it more explicit that the array has a very tight upper size
limit. Also add some more documentation about the ev.types array and
how its size is limited and affects the rest of the code.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
---
This has been compile tested only.
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
index dc30adf1..ec50e0d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
@@ -385,14 +385,16 @@ done_spin:
return ret;
}
+/* Called with ffs->ev.waitq.lock and ffs->mutex held, both released on exit. */
static ssize_t __ffs_ep0_read_events(struct ffs_data *ffs, char __user *buf,
size_t n)
{
/*
- * We are holding ffs->ev.waitq.lock and ffs->mutex and we need
- * to release them.
+ * n cannot be bigger than ffs->ev.count, which cannot be bigger than
+ * size of ffs->ev.types array (which is four) so that's how much space
+ * we reserve.
*/
- struct usb_functionfs_event events[n];
+ struct usb_functionfs_event events[ARRAY_SIZE(ffs->ev.types)];
unsigned i = 0;
memset(events, 0, sizeof events);
@@ -405,12 +407,10 @@ static ssize_t __ffs_ep0_read_events(struct ffs_data *ffs, char __user *buf,
}
} while (++i < n);
- if (n < ffs->ev.count) {
- ffs->ev.count -= n;
+ ffs->ev.count -= n;
+ if (ffs->ev.count) {
memmove(ffs->ev.types, ffs->ev.types + n,
ffs->ev.count * sizeof *ffs->ev.types);
- } else {
- ffs->ev.count = 0;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&ffs->ev.waitq.lock);
@@ -2293,6 +2293,13 @@ static void __ffs_event_add(struct ffs_data *ffs,
if (ffs->setup_state == FFS_SETUP_PENDING)
ffs->setup_state = FFS_SETUP_CANCELLED;
+ /*
+ * Logic of this function guarantees that there will be at most four
+ * pending evens on the ffs->ev.types queue. This is important since
+ * that array has only place for four elements and __ffs_event_add
+ * function also depends on that limit. If more event types are added,
+ * those limits have to be revisited or guaranteed to still hold.
+ */
switch (type) {
case FUNCTIONFS_RESUME:
rem_type2 = FUNCTIONFS_SUSPEND;
--
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON
2014-09-10 15:50 [PATCH 1/2] usb: f_fs: refactor and document __ffs_ep0_read_events better Michal Nazarewicz
@ 2014-09-10 15:50 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-09-10 16:13 ` Felipe Balbi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Nazarewicz @ 2014-09-10 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felipe Balbi, Dan Carpenter; +Cc: linux-usb, linux-kernel, Michal Nazarewicz
Even though the BUG() in __ffs_event_add is a dead-code, it is still
better to warn rather then crash the system if that code ever gets
executed.
Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
---
This has been compile tested only.
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
index ec50e0d..74d48b3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
@@ -2321,7 +2321,9 @@ static void __ffs_event_add(struct ffs_data *ffs,
break;
default:
- BUG();
+ pr_vdebug("%d: unknown event, this should not happen\n", type);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return;
}
{
--
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON
2014-09-10 15:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON Michal Nazarewicz
@ 2014-09-10 16:13 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-09-11 16:52 ` [PATCHv2] " Michal Nazarewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2014-09-10 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Nazarewicz; +Cc: Felipe Balbi, Dan Carpenter, linux-usb, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 989 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:50:25PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Even though the BUG() in __ffs_event_add is a dead-code, it is still
> better to warn rather then crash the system if that code ever gets
> executed.
>
> Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> ---
> This has been compile tested only.
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> index ec50e0d..74d48b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> @@ -2321,7 +2321,9 @@ static void __ffs_event_add(struct ffs_data *ffs,
> break;
>
> default:
> - BUG();
> + pr_vdebug("%d: unknown event, this should not happen\n", type);
> + WARN_ON(1);
WARN(1, "unknown event type %d\n", type);
Then you can drop pr_vdebug();
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON
2014-09-10 16:13 ` Felipe Balbi
@ 2014-09-11 16:52 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-09-11 16:56 ` Felipe Balbi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Nazarewicz @ 2014-09-11 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felipe Balbi; +Cc: Felipe Balbi, Dan Carpenter, linux-usb, linux-kernel
Even though the BUG() in __ffs_event_add is a dead-code, it is still
better to warn rather then crash the system if that code ever gets
executed.
Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Wed, Sep 10 2014, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> WARN(1, "unknown event type %d\n", type);
> Then you can drop pr_vdebug();
True, but the printk call will stay in the binary whereas pr_vdebug is not
included in non-debug builds. Furthermore, WARN() does not use pr_fmt.
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
index ec50e0d..ea21565 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
@@ -2321,7 +2321,8 @@ static void __ffs_event_add(struct ffs_data *ffs,
break;
default:
- BUG();
+ WARN(1, "%d: unknown event, this should not happen\n", type);
+ return;
}
{
--
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON
2014-09-11 16:52 ` [PATCHv2] " Michal Nazarewicz
@ 2014-09-11 16:56 ` Felipe Balbi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2014-09-11 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Nazarewicz; +Cc: Felipe Balbi, Dan Carpenter, linux-usb, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 924 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:52:49PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Even though the BUG() in __ffs_event_add is a dead-code, it is still
> better to warn rather then crash the system if that code ever gets
> executed.
>
> Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> On Wed, Sep 10 2014, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > WARN(1, "unknown event type %d\n", type);
> > Then you can drop pr_vdebug();
>
> True, but the printk call will stay in the binary whereas pr_vdebug is not
not a big deal. I'd rather get a message all the time this triggers.
> included in non-debug builds. Furthermore, WARN() does not use pr_fmt.
not a big deal either, we will get a stack dump and can easily figure
out where that comes from.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-11 16:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-10 15:50 [PATCH 1/2] usb: f_fs: refactor and document __ffs_ep0_read_events better Michal Nazarewicz
2014-09-10 15:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: f_fs: replace BUG in dead-code with less serious WARN_ON Michal Nazarewicz
2014-09-10 16:13 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-09-11 16:52 ` [PATCHv2] " Michal Nazarewicz
2014-09-11 16:56 ` Felipe Balbi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox