* Re: [PATCH v6 08/12] ACPI: add perf low power callback
[not found] <20220208211637.2221872-9-eranian@google.com>
@ 2022-02-09 9:32 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-02-09 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephane Eranian; +Cc: llvm, kbuild-all
Hi Stephane,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next v5.17-rc3 next-20220209]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephane-Eranian/perf-x86-amd-Add-AMD-Fam19h-Branch-Sampling-support/20220209-064255
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git ee28855a54493ce83bc2a3fbe30210be61b57bc7
config: x86_64-randconfig-a003 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220209/202202091736.pYZciCGD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e8bff9ae54a55b4dbfeb6ba55f723abbd81bf494)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/90b2d6c8c171189602e01f8c00301f7705e5d16a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Stephane-Eranian/perf-x86-amd-Add-AMD-Fam19h-Branch-Sampling-support/20220209-064255
git checkout 90b2d6c8c171189602e01f8c00301f7705e5d16a
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:168:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_lopwr_cb' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
perf_lopwr_cb(true);
^
1 error generated.
vim +/perf_lopwr_cb +168 drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
135
136 static unsigned int idle_pct = 5; /* percentage */
137 static unsigned int round_robin_time = 1; /* second */
138 static int power_saving_thread(void *data)
139 {
140 int do_sleep;
141 unsigned int tsk_index = (unsigned long)data;
142 u64 last_jiffies = 0;
143
144 sched_set_fifo_low(current);
145
146 while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
147 unsigned long expire_time;
148
149 /* round robin to cpus */
150 expire_time = last_jiffies + round_robin_time * HZ;
151 if (time_before(expire_time, jiffies)) {
152 last_jiffies = jiffies;
153 round_robin_cpu(tsk_index);
154 }
155
156 do_sleep = 0;
157
158 expire_time = jiffies + HZ * (100 - idle_pct) / 100;
159
160 while (!need_resched()) {
161 if (tsc_detected_unstable && !tsc_marked_unstable) {
162 /* TSC could halt in idle, so notify users */
163 mark_tsc_unstable("TSC halts in idle");
164 tsc_marked_unstable = 1;
165 }
166 local_irq_disable();
167
> 168 perf_lopwr_cb(true);
169
170 tick_broadcast_enable();
171 tick_broadcast_enter();
172 stop_critical_timings();
173
174 mwait_idle_with_hints(power_saving_mwait_eax, 1);
175
176 start_critical_timings();
177 tick_broadcast_exit();
178
179 perf_lopwr_cb(false);
180
181 local_irq_enable();
182
183 if (time_before(expire_time, jiffies)) {
184 do_sleep = 1;
185 break;
186 }
187 }
188
189 /*
190 * current sched_rt has threshold for rt task running time.
191 * When a rt task uses 95% CPU time, the rt thread will be
192 * scheduled out for 5% CPU time to not starve other tasks. But
193 * the mechanism only works when all CPUs have RT task running,
194 * as if one CPU hasn't RT task, RT task from other CPUs will
195 * borrow CPU time from this CPU and cause RT task use > 95%
196 * CPU time. To make 'avoid starvation' work, takes a nap here.
197 */
198 if (unlikely(do_sleep))
199 schedule_timeout_killable(HZ * idle_pct / 100);
200
201 /* If an external event has set the need_resched flag, then
202 * we need to deal with it, or this loop will continue to
203 * spin without calling __mwait().
204 */
205 if (unlikely(need_resched()))
206 schedule();
207 }
208
209 exit_round_robin(tsk_index);
210 return 0;
211 }
212
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread