* Re: [RFC V2 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
[not found] <20220412115455.293119-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
@ 2022-04-12 18:00 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-12 18:00 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-12 19:02 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-04-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual; +Cc: llvm, kbuild-all
Hi Anshuman,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master linux/master v5.18-rc2]
[cannot apply to tip/perf/core tip/master next-20220412]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220412-204141
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: i386-randconfig-a003-20220411 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220413/202204130108.zoxwYdF8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project fe2478d44e4f7f191c43fef629ac7a23d0251e72)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6d93333c8ddf355a33ed0f51718603406412afbb
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220412-204141
git checkout 6d93333c8ddf355a33ed0f51718603406412afbb
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/x86/ fs//
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c:50:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:9:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/entry-common.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
1 error generated.
--
In file included from arch/x86/entry/common.c:13:
In file included from include/linux/entry-common.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
arch/x86/entry/common.c:119:24: warning: no previous prototype for function 'do_int80_syscall_32' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
__visible noinstr void do_int80_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
arch/x86/entry/common.c:119:19: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
__visible noinstr void do_int80_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
static
arch/x86/entry/common.c:186:24: warning: no previous prototype for function 'do_fast_syscall_32' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
__visible noinstr long do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
arch/x86/entry/common.c:186:19: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
__visible noinstr long do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
static
arch/x86/entry/common.c:238:24: warning: no previous prototype for function 'do_SYSENTER_32' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
__visible noinstr long do_SYSENTER_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
arch/x86/entry/common.c:238:19: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
__visible noinstr long do_SYSENTER_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
static
3 warnings and 1 error generated.
--
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/doublefault_32.c:11:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:9:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/entry-common.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
arch/x86/kernel/doublefault_32.c:23:36: warning: no previous prototype for function 'doublefault_shim' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
asmlinkage noinstr void __noreturn doublefault_shim(void)
^
arch/x86/kernel/doublefault_32.c:23:20: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
asmlinkage noinstr void __noreturn doublefault_shim(void)
^
static
arch/x86/kernel/doublefault_32.c:114:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'doublefault_init_cpu_tss' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void doublefault_init_cpu_tss(void)
^
arch/x86/kernel/doublefault_32.c:114:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
void doublefault_init_cpu_tss(void)
^
static
2 warnings and 1 error generated.
--
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c:36:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c:1081:23: warning: no previous prototype for function 'trampoline_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
__used __visible void trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c:1081:18: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
__used __visible void trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
^
static
1 warning and 1 error generated.
vim +1685 include/linux/perf_event.h
1682
1683 static inline bool branch_sample_priv(const struct perf_event *event)
1684 {
> 1685 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC V2 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
[not found] <20220412115455.293119-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
2022-04-12 18:00 ` [RFC V2 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers kernel test robot
@ 2022-04-12 18:00 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-12 19:02 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-04-12 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual; +Cc: llvm, kbuild-all
Hi Anshuman,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master linux/master v5.18-rc2]
[cannot apply to tip/perf/core tip/master next-20220412]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220412-204141
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: s390-buildonly-randconfig-r002-20220412 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220413/202204130118.IRgT5X8j-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project fe2478d44e4f7f191c43fef629ac7a23d0251e72)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6d93333c8ddf355a33ed0f51718603406412afbb
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220412-204141
git checkout 6d93333c8ddf355a33ed0f51718603406412afbb
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:26:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1665:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1670:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1675:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1680:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
6 errors generated.
--
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:29:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1665:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1670:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1675:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1680:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:32:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgpu.h:52:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:32:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgpu.h:52:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:32:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgpu.h:52:
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
12 warnings and 6 errors generated.
--
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:13:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:13:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:13:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:13:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:66:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1665:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1670:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1675:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1680:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
kernel/sched/core.c:3453:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'sched_set_stop_task' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void sched_set_stop_task(int cpu, struct task_struct *stop)
^
kernel/sched/core.c:3453:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
void sched_set_stop_task(int cpu, struct task_struct *stop)
^
static
13 warnings and 6 errors generated.
--
In file included from kernel/sched/loadavg.c:9:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/loadavg.c:9:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/loadavg.c:9:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from kernel/sched/loadavg.c:9:
In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:66:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1665:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1670:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1675:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1680:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
~~~~~ ^
include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:16: error: no member named 'attr' in 'struct perf_event'
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
~~~~~ ^
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
12 warnings and 6 errors generated.
..
vim +1665 include/linux/perf_event.h
1662
1663 static inline bool branch_sample_no_flags(const struct perf_event *event)
1664 {
> 1665 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
1666 }
1667
1668 static inline bool branch_sample_no_cycles(const struct perf_event *event)
1669 {
1670 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
1671 }
1672
1673 static inline bool branch_sample_type(const struct perf_event *event)
1674 {
> 1675 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
1676 }
1677
1678 static inline bool branch_sample_hw_index(const struct perf_event *event)
1679 {
1680 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
1681 }
1682
1683 static inline bool branch_sample_priv(const struct perf_event *event)
1684 {
> 1685 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC V2 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
[not found] <20220412115455.293119-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
2022-04-12 18:00 ` [RFC V2 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers kernel test robot
2022-04-12 18:00 ` kernel test robot
@ 2022-04-12 19:02 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-04-12 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual; +Cc: llvm, kbuild-all
Hi Anshuman,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master linux/master v5.18-rc2]
[cannot apply to tip/perf/core tip/master next-20220412]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220412-204141
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: i386-randconfig-a001-20220411 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220413/202204130219.KG5G7zyU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project fe2478d44e4f7f191c43fef629ac7a23d0251e72)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6d93333c8ddf355a33ed0f51718603406412afbb
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220412-204141
git checkout 6d93333c8ddf355a33ed0f51718603406412afbb
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from ipc/msg.c:35:
In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:88:
In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
include/linux/perf_event.h:1685:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
>> ipc/msg.c:496:20: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned short' changes value from 32768000 to 0 [-Wconstant-conversion]
msginfo->msgseg = MSGSEG;
~ ^~~~~~
include/uapi/linux/msg.h:87:38: note: expanded from macro 'MSGSEG'
#define MSGSEG (__MSGSEG <= 0xffff ? __MSGSEG : 0xffff)
^~~~~~~~
include/uapi/linux/msg.h:86:36: note: expanded from macro '__MSGSEG'
#define __MSGSEG ((MSGPOOL * 1024) / MSGSSZ) /* max no. of segments */
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
1 warning and 1 error generated.
vim +496 ipc/msg.c
a0d092fc2df845 Pierre Peiffer 2008-04-29 475
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 476 static int msgctl_info(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int msqid,
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 477 int cmd, struct msginfo *msginfo)
a0d092fc2df845 Pierre Peiffer 2008-04-29 478 {
2cafed30f150f7 Davidlohr Bueso 2013-07-08 479 int err;
27c331a1746142 Manfred Spraul 2018-08-21 480 int max_idx;
5a06a363ef4844 Ingo Molnar 2006-07-30 481
5a06a363ef4844 Ingo Molnar 2006-07-30 482 /*
5a06a363ef4844 Ingo Molnar 2006-07-30 483 * We must not return kernel stack data.
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 484 * due to padding, it's not enough
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 485 * to set all member fields.
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 486 */
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 487 err = security_msg_queue_msgctl(NULL, cmd);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 488 if (err)
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 489 return err;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 490
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 491 memset(msginfo, 0, sizeof(*msginfo));
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 492 msginfo->msgmni = ns->msg_ctlmni;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 493 msginfo->msgmax = ns->msg_ctlmax;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 494 msginfo->msgmnb = ns->msg_ctlmnb;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 495 msginfo->msgssz = MSGSSZ;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 @496 msginfo->msgseg = MSGSEG;
d9a605e40b1376 Davidlohr Bueso 2013-09-11 497 down_read(&msg_ids(ns).rwsem);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 498 if (cmd == MSG_INFO) {
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 499 msginfo->msgpool = msg_ids(ns).in_use;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 500 msginfo->msgmap = atomic_read(&ns->msg_hdrs);
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 501 msginfo->msgtql = atomic_read(&ns->msg_bytes);
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 502 } else {
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 503 msginfo->msgmap = MSGMAP;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 504 msginfo->msgpool = MSGPOOL;
156d9ed1260ee5 Al Viro 2017-07-09 505 msginfo->msgtql = MSGTQL;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 506 }
27c331a1746142 Manfred Spraul 2018-08-21 507 max_idx = ipc_get_maxidx(&msg_ids(ns));
d9a605e40b1376 Davidlohr Bueso 2013-09-11 508 up_read(&msg_ids(ns).rwsem);
27c331a1746142 Manfred Spraul 2018-08-21 509 return (max_idx < 0) ? 0 : max_idx;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 510 }
2cafed30f150f7 Davidlohr Bueso 2013-07-08 511
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-12 19:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220412115455.293119-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
2022-04-12 18:00 ` [RFC V2 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers kernel test robot
2022-04-12 18:00 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-12 19:02 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox