* Re: [RFC PATCH v7] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid
[not found] <20230416223217.191261-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
@ 2023-04-17 1:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-17 1:49 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-04-17 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Desnoyers; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all
Hi Mathieu,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.3-rc7]
[cannot apply to tip/sched/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mathieu-Desnoyers/sched-Fix-performance-regression-introduced-by-mm_cid/20230417-063345
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230416223217.191261-1-mathieu.desnoyers%40efficios.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH v7] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid
config: riscv-randconfig-r042-20230417 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230417/202304170916.wfhHZcvE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9638da200e00bd069e6dd63604e14cbafede9324)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/3ab4bef6c0bd5b33395bbd475c423ba95b9763d6
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mathieu-Desnoyers/sched-Fix-performance-regression-introduced-by-mm_cid/20230417-063345
git checkout 3ab4bef6c0bd5b33395bbd475c423ba95b9763d6
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/sched/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304170916.wfhHZcvE-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/sched/core.c:6744:35: warning: no previous prototype for function 'schedule_user' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedule_user(void)
^
kernel/sched/core.c:6744:22: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedule_user(void)
^
static
>> kernel/sched/core.c:11770:15: warning: variable 'next_scan' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
old_scan = next_scan;
^~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/core.c:11764:31: note: initialize the variable 'next_scan' to silence this warning
unsigned long res, next_scan;
^
= 0
kernel/sched/core.c:1689:1: warning: unused function 'uclamp_update_active' [-Wunused-function]
uclamp_update_active(struct task_struct *p)
^
kernel/sched/core.c:6448:20: warning: unused function 'sched_core_cpu_deactivate' [-Wunused-function]
static inline void sched_core_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu) {}
^
4 warnings generated.
vim +/next_scan +11770 kernel/sched/core.c
11743
11744 static void task_mm_cid_work(struct callback_head *work)
11745 {
11746 struct task_struct *t = current;
11747 struct mm_struct *mm;
11748 int cpu;
11749 unsigned long now = jiffies, old_scan, next_scan;
11750 struct cpumask *cidmask;
11751 int weight;
11752
11753 SCHED_WARN_ON(t != container_of(work, struct task_struct, cid_work));
11754
11755 work->next = work; /* Prevent double-add */
11756 if (t->flags & PF_EXITING)
11757 return;
11758 mm = t->mm;
11759 if (!mm)
11760 return;
11761 old_scan = READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_next_scan);
11762 next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY);
11763 if (!old_scan) {
11764 unsigned long res, next_scan;
11765
11766 res = cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, old_scan, next_scan);
11767 if (res != old_scan)
11768 old_scan = res;
11769 else
11770 old_scan = next_scan;
11771 }
11772 if (time_before(now, old_scan))
11773 return;
11774 if (!try_cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, &old_scan, next_scan))
11775 return;
11776 cidmask = mm_cidmask(mm);
11777 /* Clear cids that were not recently used. */
11778 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
11779 sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_old(mm, cpu);
11780 weight = cpumask_weight(cidmask);
11781 /*
11782 * Clear cids that are greater or equal to the cidmask weight to
11783 * recompact it.
11784 */
11785 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
11786 sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(mm, cpu, weight);
11787 }
11788
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC PATCH v7] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid
[not found] <20230416223217.191261-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
2023-04-17 1:38 ` [RFC PATCH v7] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid kernel test robot
@ 2023-04-17 1:49 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-04-17 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Desnoyers; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all
Hi Mathieu,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.3-rc7]
[cannot apply to tip/sched/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mathieu-Desnoyers/sched-Fix-performance-regression-introduced-by-mm_cid/20230417-063345
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230416223217.191261-1-mathieu.desnoyers%40efficios.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH v7] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid
config: s390-randconfig-r024-20230417 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230417/202304170947.E0GyNhr1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9638da200e00bd069e6dd63604e14cbafede9324)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/3ab4bef6c0bd5b33395bbd475c423ba95b9763d6
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mathieu-Desnoyers/sched-Fix-performance-regression-introduced-by-mm_cid/20230417-063345
git checkout 3ab4bef6c0bd5b33395bbd475c423ba95b9763d6
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304170947.E0GyNhr1-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:33:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:33:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:33:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:11770:15: warning: variable 'next_scan' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
old_scan = next_scan;
^~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/core.c:11764:31: note: initialize the variable 'next_scan' to silence this warning
unsigned long res, next_scan;
^
= 0
kernel/sched/core.c:6448:20: warning: unused function 'sched_core_cpu_deactivate' [-Wunused-function]
static inline void sched_core_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu) {}
^
14 warnings generated.
vim +/next_scan +11770 kernel/sched/core.c
11743
11744 static void task_mm_cid_work(struct callback_head *work)
11745 {
11746 struct task_struct *t = current;
11747 struct mm_struct *mm;
11748 int cpu;
11749 unsigned long now = jiffies, old_scan, next_scan;
11750 struct cpumask *cidmask;
11751 int weight;
11752
11753 SCHED_WARN_ON(t != container_of(work, struct task_struct, cid_work));
11754
11755 work->next = work; /* Prevent double-add */
11756 if (t->flags & PF_EXITING)
11757 return;
11758 mm = t->mm;
11759 if (!mm)
11760 return;
11761 old_scan = READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_next_scan);
11762 next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY);
11763 if (!old_scan) {
11764 unsigned long res, next_scan;
11765
11766 res = cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, old_scan, next_scan);
11767 if (res != old_scan)
11768 old_scan = res;
11769 else
11770 old_scan = next_scan;
11771 }
11772 if (time_before(now, old_scan))
11773 return;
11774 if (!try_cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, &old_scan, next_scan))
11775 return;
11776 cidmask = mm_cidmask(mm);
11777 /* Clear cids that were not recently used. */
11778 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
11779 sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_old(mm, cpu);
11780 weight = cpumask_weight(cidmask);
11781 /*
11782 * Clear cids that are greater or equal to the cidmask weight to
11783 * recompact it.
11784 */
11785 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
11786 sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(mm, cpu, weight);
11787 }
11788
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread