Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/284] 5.10.221-rc2 review

Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/284] 5.10.221-rc2 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 15:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.221 release.
> There are 284 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Jul 2024 09:44:13 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.221-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

NOTE:
clang-nightly builds failed due to following errors.
  scripts/lld-version.sh: 18: arithmetic expression: expecting EOF:
"10000 * 19 + 100 * 0 + 0,"
  init/Kconfig:65: syntax error
  init/Kconfig:64: invalid statement
   - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2imFeC8AXBH72AyuJQzpKgizG4t/

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.221-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 6db6c4ec363bf8c7cfbc8ce2aa96d56be3bec0dd
* git describe: v5.10.220-285-g6db6c4ec363b
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.220-285-g6db6c4ec363b

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.220-291-g4d0fada143ed)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.220-291-g4d0fada143ed)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.220-291-g4d0fada143ed)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.220-291-g4d0fada143ed)

## Test result summary
total: 219123, pass: 182165, fail: 3108, skip: 33676, xfail: 174

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 204 total, 202 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 58 total, 56 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 46 total, 44 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 0 passed, 6 failed
* powerpc: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 50 total, 48 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-timesync-off
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/284] 5.10.221-rc2 review

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 10:46:46AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> NOTE:
> clang-nightly builds failed due to following errors.
>   scripts/lld-version.sh: 18: arithmetic expression: expecting EOF:
> "10000 * 19 + 100 * 0 + 0,"
>   init/Kconfig:65: syntax error
>   init/Kconfig:64: invalid statement
>    - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2imFeC8AXBH72AyuJQzpKgizG4t/

This is known/being worked on:

https://lore.kernel.org/20240705160007.GA875035@thelio-3990X/

Cheers,
Nathan